- From: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:38:20 -0800
- To: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
I wrote: > 2) The folks who make the retail fonts want exactly the two kinds of > protections in question, which requirements are met by EOT and > apparently by the compromise proposal as well. The minimum requirement > seems to be: URL info in the font, plus just enough obfuscation that > the font can't work in Mac or Windows without pre-processing. That > minimum will get a critical mass of retail fonts available: many font > makers would like a LOT MORE than this That last bit should read "many web developers/designers would like a LOT MORE than this..." Cheers, T
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2008 03:09:36 UTC