- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 08:15:44 +0000
- To: intelnav@yahoo.com
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Vlad Simionescu wrote: > > > What I get from it is that even if it may not mandate the current + behavior, it strongly suggests it. Is there any wording in the standard + that suggests placing the scroll bars at the edges of the visible area ? + I suppose there isn't, and so no wonder all browsers do as they do. I'm Some browsers won't use scroll bars at all. I've only seen the iPhone in advertisements, but it's user interface paradigm doesn't look like one where scroll bars would be appropriate. One key point in the reply, that I think you failed to pick up, is that there are many different ways of scrolling. The reason you were redirected from HTML is that HTML doesn't even care about how information is presented, so has no need to consider scrolling. However, in its origins, CSS started from the point of view that it only provided hints to browsers, and, in particular, that browsers should follow the conventions of the platform on which they were running, both to give a consistent look and feel, for that platform, and to avoid the need to implement the whole OS user interface (widget) library. There is a strong lobby, these days, from browser "vendors", to specify everything to such a level of detail that web pages look exactly the same on every browser, but there are still areas where this would be considered overspecification, and, I would suggest, requiring the use of scrollbars as the scrolling control is one area where some platform dependence is highly desirable. + even surprised that you say there are some frame elements which do + behave correctly (or maybe I haven't understood you right). I don't + remember having seen anything like this. > In the end, I think your real target should be Microsoft, as the particular scrolling control behaviour you are seeing is essentially that of Microsoft Windows, and you are probably only looking at browsers on that platform. There may, however, be problems for CSS in tracking radical changes in platform behaviour, because adopting them may break existing content. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Thursday, 27 November 2008 08:16:21 UTC