- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:22:00 -0800
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Patrick Garies <pgaries@fastmail.us>, www-style@w3.org
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
>> :disabled != :not(:enabled)
>> :enabled != :not(:disabled)
>> not(:enabled) && :not(:disabled) == true
>
> This is desired, yes.
>
>> :enabled && :disabled == true
>
> This can't happen.
This needs to be specified then.
:enabled and :disabled are mutually exclusive in all domains CSS is
aimed to serve.
It means that either one :enabled or :disabled is just enough for
practical needs.
input:not(:enabled) { color:gray; }
why do you need :disabled then?
--
Andrew Fedoniouk.
http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Friday, 7 November 2008 05:22:33 UTC