w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from July to September 2004 by date

Thursday, 30 September 2004

• Notes from discussion about programmatic object, non-text content Wendy Chisholm
• Robertos' regrets: Sept. 30, 2004 Agenda Roberto Castaldo
• Regrets: Sept. 30, 2004 Agenda ************************************** Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• Re: Sept. 30, 2004 Agenda ************************************** Andi Snow-Weaver
• CLOSED: Issue #883 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• CLOSED: Issue #947 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• CLOSED: Issue #761 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• CLOSED: Issue #632 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• CLOSED: Issue #690 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• CLOSED: Issue #636 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• CLOSED: Issue #589 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• CLOSED: Issue #634 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• CLOSED: Issue #245 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• CLOSED: Issue #635 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• CLOSED: Issue #638 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• CLOSED: Issue #468 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• CLOSED: Issue #449 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• CLOSED: Issue #448 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• CLOSED: Issue #211 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu

Wednesday, 29 September 2004

• CLOSED: Issue #219 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• Regrets: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 29 September 2004 Sailesh Panchang
• Sept. 30, 2004 Agenda ************************************** Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Issue #1099 (where acronym are ambiguous...) Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 29 September 2004 Li, Alex
• regrets RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 29 September 2004 gl@juicystudio.com
• CLOSED: Issue #828 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• CLOSED: Issue #680 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• CLOSED: Issue #605 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• Re: Issue #1099 (where acronym are ambiguous...) Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• CLOSED: Issue #620 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• CLOSED: Issue #222 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• CLOSED: Issue #619 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1102 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1104 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1101 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1098 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1097 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1099 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1092 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1088 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1103 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1096 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1094 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1090 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1091 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1086 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1095 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1100 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1087 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1084 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1089 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1093 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1085 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1083 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1082 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1077 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1080 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1076 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1079 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1075 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1081 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1078 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu

Tuesday, 28 September 2004

• Re: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content Gez Lemon
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 29 September 2004 Michael Cooper
• Re: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• Re: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content Michael Cooper
• The details are important Re: FW: ADA Doesn't Cover Websites, according to Federal Court Charles McCathieNevile
• NEW: Issue #1074 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• RE: ADA Doesn't Cover Websites, according to Federal Court Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content Gregg Vanderheiden

Monday, 27 September 2004

• FW: ADA Doesn't Cover Websites, according to Federal Court John M Slatin
• RE: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content Michael Cooper
• RE: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content Michael Cooper
• RE: [#1059] Prohibit URLs with javascript protocol Michael Cooper

Friday, 24 September 2004

• Re: Long description and image on same page (was RE: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004) Joe Clark

Thursday, 23 September 2004

• Re: Long description and image on same page (was RE: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004) Gez Lemon
• RE: Long description and image on same page (was RE: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004) John M Slatin
• Regrets: Agenda - September 23, 2004 Roberto Castaldo

Wednesday, 22 September 2004

• Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004 Gez Lemon

Thursday, 23 September 2004

• Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004 Gez Lemon
• Long description and image on same page (was RE: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004) John M Slatin
• Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004 Sailesh Panchang

Wednesday, 22 September 2004

• Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004 Gez Lemon
• RE: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004 John M Slatin
• Regrets (RE: Agenda - September 23, 2004 ****** ) Yvette P. Hoitink
• Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004 Gez Lemon
• RE: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004 John M Slatin
• [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004 Michael Cooper
• Re: [#1059] Prohibit URLs with javascript protocol Martin Honnen

Tuesday, 21 September 2004

• RE: [#1065] Provide a link to download an accessible plugin Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)

Wednesday, 22 September 2004

• RE: NEW: Issue #1070 Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• NEW: Issue #1070 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1067 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1073 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1072 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1068 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1069 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1071 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• Agenda - September 23, 2004 ****** Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [#1059] Prohibit URLs with javascript protocol Doug Gibson

Tuesday, 21 September 2004

• Re: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4 Joe Clark
• Re: [#1065] Provide a link to download an accessible plugin Joe Clark
• Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 22 September 2004 Joe Clark
• Re: [#1059] Prohibit URLs with javascript protocol Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• RE: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• RE: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• RE: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• [#1071] Navigational supports with LINK Michael Cooper
• [#1067] Require submit button for forms Michael Cooper
• [#1066] Relative size in HTML Michael Cooper
• [#1065] Provide a link to download an accessible plugin Michael Cooper
• [#1064] Use markup instead of other formats Michael Cooper
• [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content Michael Cooper
• [#1062] Provide a site map Michael Cooper
• [#1061] Create link text technique Michael Cooper
• [#1059] Prohibit URLs with javascript protocol Michael Cooper
• Regrets: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 22 September 2004 Ken Kipnes
• Regrets - Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 22 September 2004 Wendy Chisholm
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 22 September 2004 Michael Cooper
• NEW: Issue #1060 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1064 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1066 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1062 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1065 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1063 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1061 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1059 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu

Saturday, 18 September 2004

• CLOSED: Issue #751 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• CLOSED: Issue #323 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1058 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• Re: unique titles / headings Re: 3.2 Jason White

Friday, 17 September 2004

• RE: Guideline 1.4 and 1.5 Issues Summary and proposed resolutions John M Slatin
• RE: programmatically determined or determined programmatically. John M Slatin
• unique titles / headings Re: 3.2 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: erratum? Re: 04 Feb 2004 - Techniques Charles McCathieNevile
• Late Regrets: (Re: September 16, 2004 - Agenda WATANABE Takayuki
• (From diacritics to) simple language and grammar Charles McCathieNevile
• CLOSED: Issue #751 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• CLOSED: Issue #323 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1055 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1057 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1058 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1054 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1056 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• programmatically determined or determined programmatically. Gregg Vanderheiden
• Guideline 1.4 and 1.5 Issues Summary and proposed resolutions Ben Caldwell
• FW: 1.4 and 1.5 combination proposal Gregg Vanderheiden

Thursday, 16 September 2004

• Regrets - September 16, 2004 - Agenda Roberto Ellero
• RE: Regrets: September 16, 2004 - Agenda Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• Regrets: September 16, 2004 - Agenda Roberto Castaldo
• 21 issues to close Wendy Chisholm
• Re: [Issue 673] Proposed definitions for text, Unicode, non-text content Wendy Chisholm
• Re: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• Re: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• Re: Issue #1054 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• NEW: Issue #1054 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• NEW: Issue #1055 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
• RE: Scripting Techniques first draft (validation and popups) Doug Gibson

Wednesday, 15 September 2004

• Re: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms Gez Lemon
• Re: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms James Craig
• Re: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms Gez Lemon
• RE: Searching the list archives John M Slatin
• Re: Searching the list archives Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• Re: Searching the list archives James Craig
• Re: Searching the list archives Wendy Chisholm
• Re: OnActivate Re: Scripting Techniques first draft Martin Honnen
• Searching the list archives John M Slatin
• OnActivate Re: Scripting Techniques first draft Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Scripting Techniques first draft Tom Wright

Tuesday, 14 September 2004

• September 16, 2004 - Agenda Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Proposed Revisions to Guideline 1.1 Lee Roberts
• Re: Scripting Techniques first draft Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• Proposed Revisions to Guideline 1.1 Ben Caldwell
• Regrets: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 15 September 2004 Sailesh Panchang
• RE: Scripting Techniques first draft Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• Re: Scripting Techniques first draft Isofarro
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 15 September 2004 Michael Cooper
• Re: Scripting Techniques first draft Isofarro
• regrets Lisa Seeman
• RDF techniques Lisa Seeman
• RE: Scripting Techniques first draft Mirabella, Mathew J

Monday, 13 September 2004

• Registration open, logistics page up Wendy Chisholm
• Re: Scripting Techniques first draft James Craig
• Re: Scripting Techniques first draft Isofarro
• Re: Scripting Techniques first draft Isofarro
• RE: Scripting Techniques first draft Yvette P. Hoitink
• Guideline 2.4 success criteria concerning title- proposal Sailesh Panchang
• Title attribute on img element - not recommended? Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Scripting Techniques first draft Matt May
• Re: Scripting Techniques first draft Jim Ley
• Scripting Techniques first draft Matt May

Sunday, 12 September 2004

• process document template link re: test suite process boland@nist.gov
• RE: XAG Lisa Seeman
• RE: XAG Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• XAG Lisa Seeman
• RE: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 level 1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 level 1 Jason White
• RE: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 level 1 Jason White
• RE: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 level 1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 level 1 Jason White

Saturday, 11 September 2004

• RE: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 level 1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 level 1 Jason White
• Re: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 Jason White
• RE: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 level 1 Jason White
• RE: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 level 1 Gregg Vanderheiden

Friday, 10 September 2004

• October face-to-face: 19-22 October in Dublin, Ireland Wendy Chisholm
• Re: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 Joe Clark
• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Gregg Vanderheiden
• First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 level 1 Jason White
• Re: Application of content profile ideas to specific content types Jason White
• Re: [Fwd: Re: Brainstorming about conformance profiles] Kerstin Goldsmith

Thursday, 9 September 2004

• [Fwd: Re: Brainstorming about conformance profiles] Kerstin Goldsmith
• More: WCAG 2 - 1.2 and Caption/Audio Description Policies Katie Haritos-Shea
• WCAG 2 - 1.2 and Caption/Audio Description Policies Katie Haritos-Shea
• Regrets mostly for Thu Sept 9 Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Guideline 2.4 success criteria concerning title Wendy Chisholm
• RE: [Issue 673] Proposed definitions for text, Unicode, non-text content (without typos) Richard Ishida
• Regrets: Agenda 9-9-2004 Roberto Castaldo
• RE: [Issue 673] Proposed definitions for text, Unicode, non-text content Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: [Issue 673] Proposed definitions for text, Unicode, non-text content (without typos) Jens Meiert
• Re: [Issue 673] Proposed definitions for text, Unicode, non-text content Martin Duerst

Wednesday, 8 September 2004

• [Issue 673] Proposed definitions for text, Unicode, non-text content (without typos) Wendy Chisholm
• [Issue 673] Proposed definitions for text, Unicode, non-text content Wendy Chisholm
• Re: Agenda 9-9-2004 - regrets Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• [techs] Notes from 08 September 2004 techniques teleconference Michael Cooper
• Regrets Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 08 September 2004 WATANABE Takayuki
• Regrets (RE: Agenda 9-9-2004) Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: Agenda 9-9-2004 Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• Re: Agenda 9-9-2004 lguarino@adobe.com

Tuesday, 7 September 2004

• Re: [#899] Separate links with printable characters Gez Lemon
• Agenda 9-9-2004 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: [#899] Separate links with printable characters Joe Clark
• Re: [#899] Separate links with printable characters Gez Lemon
• Re: [#899] Separate links with printable characters Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• Re: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms - more Gez Lemon
• R: R: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites Roberto Castaldo
• RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 08 September 2004 Ben Caldwell
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 08 September 2004 Michael Cooper
• Re: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites Ineke van der Maat
• Re: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites Ineke van der Maat
• Re: R: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: R: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites lguarino@adobe.com
• RE: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites John M Slatin
• R: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites Roberto Castaldo
• Re: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites John M Slatin
• RE: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? Bailey, Bruce
• RE: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms - more Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• RE: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? Rotan Hanrahan
• Re: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? Jon Hanna
• RE: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? Rotan Hanrahan
• Re: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? Charles McCathieNevile
• R: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites Roberto Castaldo
• RE: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? Rotan Hanrahan
• RE: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Postscript RE: Proposal: purpose and approach for Gateway Gregg Vanderheiden

Monday, 6 September 2004

• RE: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? Håkon Wium Lie
• RE: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)
• RE: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)
• RE: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? Rotan Hanrahan
• Re: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? Rodolfo Vargas
• Postscript RE: Proposal: purpose and approach for Gateway John M Slatin
• Proposal: purpose and approach for Gateway John M Slatin
• Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG

Sunday, 5 September 2004

• RE: Intro to WCAG 2.0 [was Re: [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0]] Jason White

Saturday, 4 September 2004

• RE: Intro to WCAG 2.0 [was Re: [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0]] John M Slatin
• RE: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4- skip nav Joe Clark
• RE: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4- skip nav Jason White
• RE: Intro to WCAG 2.0 [was Re: [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0]] Jason White

Friday, 3 September 2004

• 3 September 2004 internal Working Drafts published Wendy Chisholm
• [TESTSUITE] Alt Text Chris Ridpath
• RE: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms John M Slatin
• RE: Intro to WCAG 2.0 [was Re: [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0]] John M Slatin
• RE: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• RE: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4- skip nav Sailesh Panchang
• Intro to WCAG 2.0 [was Re: [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0]] Shawn Lawton Henry
• Re: [1.2] issue summary and proposal Jason White
• RE: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4 Gregg Vanderheiden

Thursday, 2 September 2004

• Regrets for Re: Agenda: 2 September 2004 Telecon WATANABE Takayuki
• Re: Best practices in online captioning Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• Re: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: [1.2] issue summary and proposal Joe Clark
• Regrets: Agenda: 2 September 2004 Telecon - regrets Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• Re: Agenda: 2 September 2004 Telecon - regrets Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• Best practices in online captioning Joe Clark
• [1.2] issue summary and proposal Wendy Chisholm
• RE: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms John M Slatin

Wednesday, 1 September 2004

• Re: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms Gez Lemon
• [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms John M Slatin
• Agenda: 2 September 2004 Telecon Wendy Chisholm
• Possible regrets for September 2 Yvette P. Hoitink
• Regrets Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 01 September 2004 WATANABE Takayuki
• RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 01 September 2004 Jenae Andershonis
• [techs] IRC log from 2004-09-01 techniques teleconference Michael Cooper
• Fwd: QA Framework: New versions !!! Tim Boland
• RE: [Techs] Draft Gateway Techniques for Guideline 1.3 John M Slatin
• Application of content profile ideas to specific content types Jason White
• RE: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4 Jim Thatcher
• Possible characteristics to be used in conformance profiles Jason White

Tuesday, 31 August 2004

• RE: [Techs] Draft Gateway Techniques for Guideline 1.3 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [Techs] Draft Gateway Techniques for Guideline 1.3 John M Slatin
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 01 September 2004 Michael Cooper
• RE: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Notes from brainstorming session Wendy Chisholm

Monday, 30 August 2004

• [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4 Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 Ben Caldwell
• RE: R: WCAG Logos are not WCAG compliant? Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• R: WCAG Logos are not WCAG compliant? Roberto Castaldo
• RE: [Techs] Draft Gateway Techniques for Guideline 1.3 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites Lisa Seeman
• RE: Guideline 2.4 L2, SC2 Skip nav link Jason White
• WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: Guideline 2.4 L2, SC2 Skip nav link Lisa Seeman
• [Techs] Draft Gateway Techniques for Guideline 1.3 John M Slatin
• Re: Guideline 2.4 L2, SC2 Skip nav link Jason White
• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 (Braille Formatting) Jason White
• Guideline 2.4 L2, SC2 Skip nav link Sailesh Panchang
• Guideline 2.4 and 1.3: HTML technique for structure in docs Sailesh Panchang
• Guideline 2.4 and 1.3: HTML technique for structure in docs Sailesh Panchang
• HTML technique: repeated for title? Sailesh Panchang
• Guideline 2.4 success criteria concerning title Sailesh Panchang

Sunday, 29 August 2004

• Using Bugziller Lisa Seeman
• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 (Braille Formatting) Lisa Seeman
• RE: [TECH] What is the WCAG stance on blinking? Lisa Seeman

Saturday, 28 August 2004

• ANN: formsPlayer combines XForms and the CSS3 Speech Module to produce multimodal forms Mark Birbeck
• Re: Monday, 30 August brainstorm about conformance profiles Gez Lemon
• Thoughts on conformance profiles Jason White
• Update: Next face-to-face meeting Wendy Chisholm
• Issues update [week of 23 August 2004] Wendy Chisholm
• Regrets for Thursday, Sept 2 lguarino@adobe.com
• Monday, 30 August brainstorm about conformance profiles Wendy Chisholm

Friday, 27 August 2004

• Re: [#1021] css blink effects Gez Lemon
• [#1021] css blink effects Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• RE: [TECH] What is the WCAG stance on blinking? Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• [TECH] What is the WCAG stance on blinking? Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• RE: [TECH] Possible CSS Technique for image-text Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: [TECH] Possible CSS Technique for image-text John M Slatin
• RE: [TECH] Possible CSS Technique for image-text Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 (Braille Formatting) Jim Allan
• RE: [TECH] Possible CSS Technique for image-text John M Slatin
• RE: [TECH] Possible CSS Technique for image-text Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com

Thursday, 26 August 2004

• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 (Braille Formatting) Jason White
• Proposal: Authoring tools Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: [TECH] Possible CSS Technique for image-text Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 (Braille Formatting) Jim Allan
• Regrets for 24 august telcon Roberto Castaldo
• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 (Braille Formatting) John M Slatin
• [TECH] Possible CSS Technique for image-text Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• Re: Agenda: 26 August 2004 Telecon - regrets Roberto Ellero
• REGRETS - Re: Agenda: 26 August 2004 Telecon Doyle-Work
• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 (Braille Formatting) Jim Allan
• Re: [#925] mandatory H1 Michele Diodati
• RE: Re: [#925] mandatory H1 Lee Roberts
• RE: Re: [#925] mandatory H1 Yvette P. Hoitink
• Re: Re: [#925] mandatory H1 Michele Diodati
• Re: [#925] mandatory H1 Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• Re: [#925] mandatory H1 Jens Meiert
• Re: [#925] mandatory H1 Michele Diodati

Wednesday, 25 August 2004

• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 Joe Clark
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' Joe Clark
• Agenda: 26 August 2004 Telecon Wendy Chisholm
• WCAG2 Conformance Test Suite Chris Ridpath
• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 Lee Roberts
• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 Jens Meiert
• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: [techs] how to make a readable and clear page using CSS Lisa Seeman
• Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 25 August 2004 Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com

Tuesday, 24 August 2004

• Re: [#899] Separate links with printable characters Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: [#899] Separate links with printable characters Gez Lemon
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 25 August 2004 Michael Cooper
• [#925] mandatory H1 Michael Cooper
• [#922] contrast Michael Cooper
• [#918] NOSCRIPT Michael Cooper
• [#915] title for OBJECT Michael Cooper
• [#913] misuse of LI Michael Cooper
• [#912] label positioning Michael Cooper
• [#906, #907, #908, #909] Presentation elements Michael Cooper
• [#905] AREA targets Michael Cooper
• [#904, #916] Color in APPLET and OBJECT Michael Cooper
• [#903, #917] APPLET and OBJECT flicker Michael Cooper
• [#902] Document usable when APPLET disabled Michael Cooper
• [#901, #914] APPLET and OBJECT accessibility Michael Cooper
• [#900] Document readable without CSS support Michael Cooper
• [#899] Separate links with printable characters Michael Cooper
• Re: [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0] Kynn Bartlett
• Re: [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0] wendy
• Re: [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0] James Craig
• Re: [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0] Jason White

Monday, 23 August 2004

• Re: [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0] Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0] Chris Ridpath
• [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0] James Craig

Friday, 20 August 2004

• New issues [week of 16 August] Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' Jens Meiert
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' Joe Clark
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' Jens Meiert

Thursday, 19 August 2004

• Re: Agenda for 8/19/04 - regrets Roberto Ellero
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' Jens Meiert
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' Jens Meiert
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' Jens Meiert
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' Jens Meiert
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' Jens Meiert
• Re: Agenda for 8/19/04 Matt May

Wednesday, 18 August 2004

• RE: [Techs] Short text alternatives for object element John M Slatin
• RE: Agenda for 8/19/04 - regrets Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: [Techs] Short text alternatives for object element Joe Clark
• RE: [Techs] Short text alternatives for object element John M Slatin
• RE: Request for feedback on Gateway to Techniques working draft John M Slatin
• Re: Agenda for 8/19/04 - regrets Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• Agenda for 8/19/04 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Request for feedback on Gateway to Techniques working draft Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [Techs] Short text alternatives for object element Joe Clark
• Fourth quarter milestones and timeline Wendy A Chisholm
• Request for feedback on Gateway to Techniques working draft John M Slatin
• RE: accessibility issue? John M Slatin
• Re: accessibility issue? Kerstin Goldsmith
• RE: accessibility issue? John M Slatin
• accessibility issue? Kerstin Goldsmith

Tuesday, 17 August 2004

• RE: Comments on WCAG 2.0 Working Draft by WAI AUWG Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• Re: Comments on WCAG 2.0 Working Draft by WAI AUWG Wendy A Chisholm
• Comments on WCAG 2.0 Working Draft by WAI AUWG Jan Richards
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 18 August 2004 Michael Cooper
• [tech] action item - titles in html techniques Lisa Seeman

Monday, 16 August 2004

• RE: [Techs] Short text alternatives for object element John M Slatin
• RE: [Techs] Short text alternatives for object element John M Slatin
• RE: [Techs] Short text alternatives for object element Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• [Techs] Short text alternatives for object element John M Slatin
• [TECH] Do we need gateway technique 3.1.2 Unambiguous decoding? Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• [TECH] Updated end 2 end mapping of Guideline 3.1 with test cases Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• FW: USE OF ACCESSIBLE TECHNOLOGY REPORTS AVAILABLE: New Microsoft & Forrester Research Study John M Slatin
• Regrets: for Aug 18 and 19 Sailesh Panchang

Sunday, 15 August 2004

• RE: [techlunch] Usability & Accessibility Working Group announces launch of new web site Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• FW: [techlunch] Usability & Accessibility Working Group announces launch of new web site John M Slatin

Saturday, 14 August 2004

• regrets for Aug 19 Loretta Guarino Reid

Thursday, 12 August 2004

• Regrets - Re: Agenda for 8/12/04 Doyle
• partial regrets: RE: Agenda for 8/12/04 Mike Barta
• Regrets for today Avi Arditti
• Regrets for today Roberto Ellero
• Re: Regrets: Aug 12 meet WATANABE Takayuki
• Regrets: Aug 12 meet Sailesh Panchang

Wednesday, 11 August 2004

• RE: Agenda for 8/12/04 John M Slatin
• Agenda for 8/12/04 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Regrets: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 11 August 2004 WATANABE Takayuki
• [techs] IRC minutes of 04 August and 11 August techniques telecons Michael Cooper
• FW: RSVP: joint telecon August 2004 at 16:00 UTC Lisa Seeman
• Re: Access key background information Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 11 August 2004 Michael Cooper
• RE: techniques for better as well as for good [was: Re: programaticallylocated.doc] Jason White

Tuesday, 10 August 2004

• 3 to 2 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: "Multimedia alternatives" in 1.1 (was Re: Re issue 330: proposed wording to replace "explicitly associated") Joe Clark
• RE: questions re: task for 3.2? Michael Cooper
• RE: Conformance level: statement needs change? Gregg Vanderheiden

Monday, 9 August 2004

• Programmatically located and user agents John M Slatin
• Conformance level: statement needs change? Sailesh Panchang
• Changes to guideline 2.4- proposal Sailesh Panchang
• please see XTECH archives for agenda for Wednesday's WCAG:SW:PF joint call Al Gilman
• RE: "Multimedia alternatives" in 1.1 (was Re: Re issue 330: proposed wording to replace "explicitly associated") John M Slatin
• Re: "Multimedia alternatives" in 1.1 (was Re: Re issue 330: proposed wording to replace "explicitly associated") Joe Clark
• "Multimedia alternatives" in 1.1 (was Re: Re issue 330: proposed wording to replace "explicitly associated") John M Slatin
• RE: Re issue 330: proposed wording to replace "programmatically identified" John M Slatin
• Re issue 330: proposed wording to replace "explicitly associated" John M Slatin
• Re issue 330: proposed wording to replace "programmatically determined" John M Slatin
• Re issue 330: Proposed wording to replace "derived programmatically" John M Slatin
• Re issue 330: proposed wording to replace "programmatically identified" John M Slatin
• questions re: task for 3.2? Tim Boland
• test case evaluation criteria? Tim Boland

Sunday, 8 August 2004

• Checklist for Success Criteria WCAG 2.0 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG

Saturday, 7 August 2004

• late regrets Re: Agenda: Aug 5 2004 WCAG WG telecon Lisa Seeman
• Fwd: Re: [css techs] new draft for discussion, list of to dos (Comments) Jens Meiert

Friday, 6 August 2004

• Late regrets: Agenda: Aug 5 2004 WCAG WG telecon Roberto Ellero

Thursday, 5 August 2004

• Re: Regrets for today WATANABE Takayuki
• logistics for next week's joint call Al Gilman
• Access key background information Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Regrets for today Paul Bohman
• partial regrets. RE: Agenda: Aug 5 2004 WCAG WG telecon Mike Barta
• Re: CSS generated content Joe Clark
• RE: proper use of <u> and <i> elements Fentress, Robert
• Regrets for today Avi Arditti
• Accesskey examples from Web mail archive redesign Al Gilman
• 11 August 2004: Joint teleconference with PFWG, Semantic Web folks, and others Wendy A Chisholm
• [accesskey] update for WCAG on PF discussions Al Gilman
• RE: Back to business Chris O'Kennon
• Re: Back to business Joe Clark
• Re: Access key background information - tables attached Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• Access key background information Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• Regrets until 31th aug. 2004 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Regrets (RE: Agenda: Aug 5 2004 WCAG WG telecon ) Yvette P. Hoitink
• Re: proper use of <u> and <i> elements Joe Clark

Wednesday, 4 August 2004

• [techs] Continuing the End to End (E2E) Process Jenae Andershonis
• Re: Agenda: Aug 5 2004 WCAG WG telecon Loretta Guarino Reid
• Agenda: Aug 5 2004 WCAG WG telecon Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: proper use of <u> and <i> elements John M Slatin
• proper use of <u> and <i> elements Fentress, Robert
• RE: Searching guidelines and techniques Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Searching guidelines and techniques Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Searching guidelines and techniques John M Slatin
• RE: Searching guidelines and techniques John M Slatin
• RE: Accessibility studies in the latest issue of First Monday Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• RE: Searching guidelines and techniques Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Searching guidelines and techniques Jason White
• RE: Accessibility studies in the latest issue of First Monday Charles McCathieNevile

Tuesday, 3 August 2004

• Searching guidelines and techniques John M Slatin
• RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 04 August 2004 - addendum Michael Cooper
• RE: Accessibility studies in the latest issue of First Monday Michael Cooper
• RE: 30 July 2004 WCAG 2.0 Working Drafts published Richard Ishida
• RE: Accessibility studies in the latest issue of First Monday Lee Roberts
• RE: Accessibility studies in the latest issue of First Monday Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• FW: Accessibility studies in the latest issue of First Monday John M Slatin
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 04 August 2004 Michael Cooper

Monday, 2 August 2004

• 30 July 2004 WCAG 2.0 Working Drafts published Wendy A Chisholm
• Regrets for August 6, 13 and 20 Roberto Castaldo

Saturday, 31 July 2004

• Back to business Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Communication RE: gainsaying and Flash captioning John M Slatin
• RE: deaf-blind RE: Flash captioning (was: RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary?) Lee Roberts
• RE: deaf-blind RE: Flash captioning (was: RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary?) Fentress, Robert
• Communication RE: gainsaying and Flash captioning Charles McCathieNevile
• deaf-blind RE: Flash captioning (was: RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary?) Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 30 July 2004

• RE: Flash captioning (was: RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary?) Joe Clark
• RE: Flash captioning (was: RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary?) Lee Roberts
• RE: Flash captioning (was: RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary?) Joe Clark
• RE: Flash captioning (was: RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary?) John M Slatin
• RE: WCAG WG discussion of "authored unit" Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: WCAG WG discussion of "authored unit" Jason White
• RE: WCAG WG discussion of "authored unit" Rhys Lewis
• xhtml basic Ineke van der Maat
• RE: Problems with guideline 4.1 Jason White
• RE: optgroup Gregg Vanderheiden
• [partial update] gateway with John's edits, more links to html techs Wendy A Chisholm

Thursday, 29 July 2004

• Re: optgroup Paul Bohman
• RE: WCAG WG discussion of "authored unit" Rotan Hanrahan
• Gateway TECH's suggestions David MacDonald
• RE: Flash captioning (was: RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary?) Lee Roberts
• Flash captioning (was: RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary?) Joe Clark
• RE: optgrou (was: Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques) Lee Roberts
• Regrets for today Avi Arditti
• RE: contain edits to HTML techs: Fwd: Proposed changes to Gateway Techniques draft John M Slatin
• RE: HTML Techniques: General comments on July draft Ben Caldwell
• RE: Gateway Techniques draft: responses to two editorial notes Gregg Vanderheiden
• optgrou (was: Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques) Joe Clark
• RE: Gateway Techniques draft: responses to two editorial notes John M Slatin
• RE: contain edits to HTML techs: Fwd: Proposed changes to Gateway Techniques draft Michael Cooper
• RE: Optional techniques - another proposed editorial note for the techniques drafts John M Slatin
• Optional techniques - another proposed editorial note for the techniques drafts Ben Caldwell
• R: Agenda: 29 July 2004 WCAG WG telecon Roberto Castaldo
• Re: Gateway Techniques draft: responses to two editorial notes Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Meaning and scope of "authored unit" Wendy A Chisholm
• regrets Matt May
• HTML Techniques: General comments on July draft John M Slatin
• RE: Problems with guideline 4.1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Problems with guideline 4.1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Techniques drafts and UA information Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Agenda: 29 July 2004 WCAG WG telecon Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Issues raised with HTML techniques Michael Cooper
• RE: Problems with guideline 4.1 Lee Roberts
• RE: Problems with guideline 4.1 Michael Cooper
• RE: Techniques drafts and UA information John M Slatin
• Techniques drafts and UA information Ben Caldwell
• RE: Problems with guideline 4.1 Jason White

Wednesday, 28 July 2004

• Re: Agenda: 29 July 2004 WCAG WG telecon Jason White
• Agenda: 29 July 2004 WCAG WG telecon Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Please review: New drafts of Gateway techniques John M Slatin
• RE: Problems with guideline 4.1 Michael Cooper
• RE: Issues with guideline 4.2 Michael Cooper
• Gateway Techniques draft: responses to two editorial notes John M Slatin
• Proposed changes to Gateway Techniques draft John M Slatin
• Invitation: W3C DIWG Workshop on Metadata for Content Adaptation Rotan Hanrahan
• [techs] Auto submit combo boxes - Bugzilla 272 Jim Thatcher
• Re: Regrets: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 28 July 2004 Donald F. Evans
• Regrets: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 28 July 2004 Sailesh Panchang
• Please review: New drafts of Gateway techniques Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques Paul Bohman
• Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques Joe Clark
• Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques Paul Bohman
• RE: Issues with guideline 4.2 Lee Roberts
• RE: Issues with guideline 4.2 Gregg Vanderheiden

Tuesday, 27 July 2004

• Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques Joe Clark
• Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques Joe Clark
• RE: New internal draft of HTML techniques Jim Thatcher
• Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques Paul Bohman
• Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques Paul Bohman
• Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• RE: New internal draft of HTML techniques Jim Thatcher
• RE: New internal draft of HTML techniques Jim Thatcher
• Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques Jens Meiert
• Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques Paul Bohman
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 28 July 2004 Michael Cooper
• RE: Agenda items for July 20, 2004 telecon John M Slatin
• [css-techs] new draft for discussion and publication Wendy A Chisholm
• New internal draft of HTML techniques Michael Cooper

Monday, 26 July 2004

• Re: Review Accessibility Site? Charles McCathieNevile
• Review Accessibility Site? Fentress, Robert
• July 26 - Updated Internal WD Ben Caldwell
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Fentress, Robert
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Fentress, Robert
• RE: Issues with guideline 4.2 Fentress, Robert
• RE: Meaning and scope of "authored unit" Jason White
• RE: Meaning and scope of "authored unit" Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Problems with guideline 4.1 Jason White
• RE: Meaning and scope of "authored unit" Jason White
• RE: Issues with guideline 4.2 Jason White

Sunday, 25 July 2004

• RE: Issues with guideline 4.2 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Issues with guideline 4.2 Lee Roberts
• RE: Issues with guideline 4.2 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Problems with guideline 4.1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Meaning and scope of "authored unit" Gregg Vanderheiden
• Meaning and scope of "authored unit" Jason White
• Problems with guideline 4.1 Jason White
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Jason White
• Issues with guideline 4.2 Jason White
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Jason White
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Gregg Vanderheiden

Saturday, 24 July 2004

• Re: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Isofarro

Friday, 23 July 2004

• [techs] Action Item from July techniques F2F: End to End for 1.1 (Phases 1-5) Jenae Andershonis
• Press Release: MathPlayer Neil Soiffer
• Very late regrets: Agenda items for July 20, 2004 telecon Roberto Castaldo
• Late regrets: Agenda items for July 20, 2004 telecon Roberto Ellero
• RE: Proposal for this fridays draft linking from Guidelines to techniques Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Jason White
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Fentress, Robert

Thursday, 22 July 2004

• Proposal for this fridays draft linking from Guidelines to techniques David MacDonald
• RE: Agenda items for July 20, 2004 telecon Mike Barta
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Fentress, Robert
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Fentress, Robert
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Lee Roberts
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Joe Clark
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Lee Roberts
• REGRETS - Re: Agenda items for July 20, 2004 telecon Doyle
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Joe Clark
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Lee Roberts
• Heat and Light Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Michael Cooper
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Fentress, Robert
• Regrets: Agenda items for July 20, 2004 telecon Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Lee Roberts

Wednesday, 21 July 2004

• Agenda items for July 20, 2004 telecon Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Fentress, Robert
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Lee Roberts
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Lee Roberts
• [techs] use of http headers for language information Richard Ishida
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Gregg Vanderheiden
• [techs] internal draft of HTML techniques Michael Cooper
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Fentress, Robert
• Re: [css techs] new draft for discussion, list of to dos (Comments) Jens Meiert
• Re: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Lee Roberts
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Fentress, Robert
• [css techs] new draft for discussion, list of to dos Wendy A Chisholm

Tuesday, 20 July 2004

• Re: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Lee Roberts
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Gregg Vanderheiden
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 21 July 2004 Michael Cooper
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Fentress, Robert
• Re: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Lee Roberts
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? Michael Cooper
• Regrets: Wednesday July 21 meet Sailesh Panchang
• Instructions and cues in online forms: HTML+CSS solution Sailesh Panchang
• 1.1 revisions and issue summaries for next draft Ben Caldwell
• Re: [techs] scripts Jim Ley

Wednesday, 1 September 2004

• RE: [techs] scripts Lisa Seeman

Tuesday, 20 July 2004

• [css techs] issues list udpdate Wendy A Chisholm
• FW: [techs] scripts Doug Gibson

Monday, 19 July 2004

• Re: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? Jim Ley
• Javascript alternatives not necessary? Fentress, Robert

Saturday, 17 July 2004

• Re: [techs] scripts Jim Ley

Friday, 16 July 2004

• scripts both [tech] and not [tech] (to be or not to be...) Lisa Seeman
• RE: [techs] scripts Doug Gibson

Thursday, 15 July 2004

• Re: [techs] scripts James Craig
• Re: [techs] HTML Lisa Seeman
• [techs] scripts Lisa Seeman
• RE: [July F2F]] Proposed wording on Conformance and Conformance Claims Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: [July F2F]] Proposed wording on Conformance and Conformance Claims Matt May
• RE: [July F2F]] Proposed wording on Conformance and Conformance Claims Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [July F2F]] Proposed wording on Conformance and Conformance Claims Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: [July F2F]] Proposed wording on Conformance and Conformance Claims Jason White
• [July F2F]] Proposed wording on Conformance and Conformance Claims John M Slatin

Wednesday, 14 July 2004

• RE: having slept on the conversation.... Gregg Vanderheiden
• No WG Telecon this week since we are meeting in Face to face. Gregg Vanderheiden

Tuesday, 13 July 2004

• Re: Fw: having slept on the conversation.... Jason White
• Proposals Lisa Seeman
• RE: having slept on the conversation.... Michael Cooper
• Re: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? Al Gilman

Monday, 12 July 2004

• [techs] CANCELLED techniques teleconference 14 July 2004 Michael Cooper

Tuesday, 13 July 2004

• RE: having slept on the conversation.... Yvette P. Hoitink
• Fw: having slept on the conversation.... Lisa Seeman

Monday, 12 July 2004

• RDF for transcoding Re: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? Lisa Seeman
• Re: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? Richard Schwerdtfeger
• RE: A question on bypassing a group of links - IE work around Bailey, Bruce
• RE: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? Lisa Seeman
• RE: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? - nit picking Lisa Seeman

Saturday, 10 July 2004

• FW: Carrot Browsing Mode and Tables. Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? Jim Ley

Friday, 9 July 2004

• RE: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? Richard Schwerdtfeger

Saturday, 10 July 2004

• Content selection Jason White
• RE: Applicability of guidelines Jason White

Friday, 9 July 2004

• RE: A question on bypassing a group of links - IE work around Jim Thatcher
• RE: A question on bypassing a group of links - IE work around Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• Re: A question on bypassing a group of links James Craig
• RE: A question on bypassing a group of links Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• RE: Applicability of guidelines Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Applicability of guidelines John M Slatin
• Applicability of guidelines Jason White
• RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording Gregg Vanderheiden

Thursday, 8 July 2004

• Regrets Agenda July 8th Avi Arditti
• RE: Linear reading order Joe Clark
• Re: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording Andi Snow-Weaver
• [TECH] End to end for 3.1 and 3.2 Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• regrets: AGENDA JULY 8th Roberto Ellero
• Regrets: AGENDA JULY 8th Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• correction Fentress, Robert
• Glossary addition proposal for "link" (Was: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc.) James Craig
• Revised collapsible menu nav script Fentress, Robert
• RE: Linear reading order John M Slatin
• Re: InfoWalker "Broswer Companion" Charles McCathieNevile
• InfoWalker "Broswer Companion" John M Slatin
• RE: [3.1][2.4] Informative page titles: suggested solution Lee Roberts
• Re: [3.1][2.4] Informative page titles: suggested solution Jason White
• Re: [3.1][2.4] Informative page titles: suggested solution Jason White
• RE: Linear reading order Jason White

Wednesday, 7 July 2004

• RE: Linear reading order John M Slatin
• Suggestion for image of overview of documents Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: [3.1][2.4] Informative page titles: suggested solution Yvette P. Hoitink
• Regrets Geoff Deering
• RE: Linear reading order Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [3.1][2.4] Informative page titles: suggested solution Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: [3.1][2.4] Informative page titles: suggested solution Joe Clark
• RE: Linear reading order Joe Clark
• RE: Regrets 07/07/04 Paul Bohman
• RE: AGENDA JULY 8th John M Slatin
• RE: Linear reading order Richard Ishida
• RE: Linear reading order John M Slatin
• Regrets:: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 07 July 2004 Sailesh Panchang
• RE: Linear reading order Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Linear reading order Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: Linear reading order Jason White
• RE: Linear reading order Jason White
• [3.1][2.4] Informative page titles: suggested solution Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording Yvette P. Hoitink
• Regrets 07/07/04 Tom Croucher
• RE: Linear reading order Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: [#830] Requirement for page title should be level 2 or level 1 Jason White
• RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording Jason White
• RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording Gregg Vanderheiden
• [techs] checklist prototyping - initial notes Ben Caldwell
• RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording Lee Roberts
• RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording Jason White
• Linear reading order Jason White

Tuesday, 6 July 2004

• AGENDA JULY 8th Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [techs] Re: collapsible hierarchical menu navigation javascript (accessible) Fentress, Robert
• Re: [techs] Re: collapsible hierarchical menu navigation javascript (accessible) James Craig
• RE: [techs] Re: collapsible hierarchical menu navigation javascript (accessible) Fentress, Robert
• RE: collapsible hierarchical menu navigation javascript (accessible) Fentress, Robert
• RE: collapsible hierarchical menu navigation javascript (accessible) Fentress, Robert
• RE: collapsible hierarchical menu navigation javascript (accessible) Fentress, Robert
• [techs] Re: collapsible hierarchical menu navigation javascript (accessible) James Craig
• Re: collapsible hierarchical menu navigation javascript (accessible) Martin Honnen
• RE: collapsible hierarchical menu navigation javascript (accessible) Richard Ishida
• Re: List Markup to Achieve Skip Repetitive Navigation Links Funct ionality Sailesh Panchang
• collapsible hierarchical menu navigation javascript (accessible) Fentress, Robert
• RE: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 07 July 2004 John M Slatin
• RE: List Markup to Achieve Skip Repetitive Navigation Links Funct ionality Michael Cooper
• [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 07 July 2004 Michael Cooper
• RE: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) Michael Cooper
• RE: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) Jason White

Monday, 5 July 2004

• RE: A question on bypassing a group of links Jim Thatcher
• RE: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) John M Slatin
• German and WCAG 2.0 principles Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: WCAG 2: tying documents together Richard Ishida
• RE: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) Jason White

Sunday, 4 July 2004

• A question on bypassing a group of links Vicente Luque Centeno

Friday, 2 July 2004

• RE: List Markup to Achieve Skip Repetitive Navigation Links Functionality John M Slatin
• List Markup to Achieve Skip Repetitive Navigation Links Functionality Fentress, Robert
• Re: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) James Craig
• RE: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) John M Slatin
• RE: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) John M Slatin
• Re: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) James Craig
• RE: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) Jim Thatcher
• RE: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) Ineke van der Maat
• Re: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) James Craig
• RE: Clear link text - my thoughts Yvette P. Hoitink
• Re: Clear link text - my thoughts Jens Meiert

Thursday, 1 July 2004

• Re: Topics for Face - to - face call for comments to the list. Jason White
• RE: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) Ben Caldwell
• Re: Regrets: July 1, 2004 WATANABE Takayuki
• Re: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) John M Slatin
• Re: WCAG 2: tying documents together Shawn Lawton Henry
• WCAG 2: tying documents together Sailesh Panchang
• RE: [#828] Definition of foreground and background John M Slatin
• RE: [#828] Definition of foreground and background Andi Snow-Weaver
• Regrets: July 1, 2004 Agenda Roberto Castaldo
• Clear link text - my thoughts Yvette P. Hoitink
• Regrets: July 1, 2004 Avi Arditti
• Topics for Face - to - face call for comments to the list. Gregg Vanderheiden
• R: WCAG Logos are not WCAG compliant? Roberto Castaldo
• RE: WCAG Logos are not WCAG compliant? Gregg Vanderheiden
• R: WCAG Logos are not WCAG compliant? Roberto Castaldo
• regrets - Re: July 1, 2004 Agenda Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• RE: July 1, 2004 Agenda Roberto Ellero
• RE: [#828] Definition of foreground and background Doyle
• Re: WCAG Logos are not WCAG compliant? Doyle

Last message date: Thursday, 30 September 2004 19:55:23 UTC