- From: Roberto Castaldo <r.castaldo@iol.it>
- Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 15:41:57 +0200
- To: "'John M Slatin'" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, "'Gregg Vanderheiden'" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "'Roberto Scano \(IWA/HWG\)'" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>, <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, <jbrewer@w3.org>
Hi John, hi group It was me (Roberto Castaldo), not Scano who answered to Gregg... How many Robertos in this group!!! ;-) John: I am also coming to agree with the position Lisa Seaman took in a recent post: that 11.4 *may* allow alternative *renderings* when they are generated from a single source, for example an XML source to which different XSLT transformations are applied. Roberto Castaldo: That's one of the main points against the alternative web sites; the content source must be one and unique, the resultant web pages (or sites in this case) may be multiple using CSS or XSLT; all others solutions should be explicitally forbidden because they cannot ensure that the "main" page and the "alternative" ones have the same content and functionality. My best regards, Roberto Castaldo ----------------------------------- www.Webaccessibile.Org coordinator IWA/HWG Member rcastaldo@webaccessibile.org r.castaldo@iol.it Icq 178709294 -----------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2004 13:46:30 UTC