- From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 08:17:41 +0200
- To: <leeroberts@roserockdesign.com>, <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I like the second proposal ----- Messaggio originale ----- Da: "Lee Roberts"<leeroberts@roserockdesign.com> Inviato: 07/07/04 5.28.50 A: "jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au"<jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>, "'Web Content Guidelines'"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Oggetto: RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording I propose the following: "Design all content functionality to operate with a keyboard or keyboard interface." or "All content functionality is designed to be operated with a keyboard or keyboard interface." Lee Roberts http://www.applepiecart.com http://www.roserockdesign.com -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jason White Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 9:13 PM To: Web Content Guidelines Subject: RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording Gregg Vanderheiden writes: > > "1. Content is designed so that it can all be operated from a > keyboard or keyboard interface." > I expect this is the proposal we will be discussing on Thursday. It could be written: "The content is designed so that all of its functionality can be operated from a keyboard or keyboard interface." or "All of the content is designed so that it can be operated from a keyboard or keyboard interface." or "All of the content is designed to be operated from a keyboard or keyboard interface." etc. I am not sure which is clearest (including Gregg's original proposal); the differences are relatively minor. [Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per recuperare la restante parte.]
Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2004 02:17:40 UTC