- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 13:50:37 -0500
- To: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, jbrewer@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 2 September 2004 18:50:43 UTC
On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 03:07, Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG wrote: > Hi to all the group. > I hope this message isn't off topic. > > This regards the WCAG 1.0 Reccomandation [1] and expecially the > checkpoint 11.4: > > 11.4 If, after best efforts, you cannot create an accessible page, > provide a link to an alternative page that uses W3C technologies, is > accessible, has equivalent information (or functionality), and is > updated as often as the inaccessible (original) page. [Priority 1] [snip] > Discussing in web accessibility mailing lists, also with the > partecipation of some lawyers, as explained the checkpoint *could* > authorize - after best efforts - to create parallel web sites that is a > group of "alternative page for every page". Yes, as far as I understand, that is true. Why is this problematic (other than for the reasons cited in the checkpoint and note)? _ Ian -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 2 September 2004 18:50:43 UTC