- From: Jim Thatcher <jim@jimthatcher.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:26:55 -0500
- To: "'Ineke van der Maat'" <inekemaa@xs4all.nl>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Ineke van der Maat: <quote> When a screenreader can spring von link to link and in every link is written "read more", so what do you understand/remember after hearing this 4 times? </quote> Jim: I'm sure James understands that problem. But when information is in the title attribute screen readers can announce it - though not necessarily by default. (JAWS options are: link text, title text, or longest text). The "click hear" metaphor for this problem is not a good one because the "click here" sentence can be easily rephrased to yield link text that is adequate. Much more frequent and daunting is the situation where numerous distinct textual items have links associated with them and these would be like James' example "Read more." A few years back, when we first launched the IBM accessibility guidelines (http://ibm.com/able/guidelines.html) each guideline had some text (the checkpoint text) and then three links, "rationale", "techniques" and "testing". There are many examples like that. Situations like that are common where and full text links are not reasonable. As I understand the current proposal, it would allow such links (assuming a title gave more detail) at level 1, but not level 3. That seems OK to me. Jim Accessibility, What Not to do: http://jimthatcher.com/whatnot.htm. Web Accessibility Tutorial: http://jimthatcher.com/webcourse1.htm.
Received on Friday, 2 July 2004 14:28:16 UTC