- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 08:53:19 -0500
- To: "Roberto Castaldo" <r.castaldo@iol.it>, "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "Roberto Scano \(IWA/HWG\)" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>, <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, <jbrewer@w3.org>
Roberto Castaldo wrote: <blockquote> Hi John, hi group It was me (Roberto Castaldo), not Scano who answered to Gregg... How many Robertos in this group!!! ;-) </blockquote> Whoops! Sorry about that! <blockquote> John: I am also coming to agree with the position Lisa Seaman took in a recent post: that 11.4 *may* allow alternative *renderings* when they are generated from a single source, for example an XML source to which different XSLT transformations are applied. Roberto Castaldo: That's one of the main points against the alternative web sites; the content source must be one and unique, the resultant web pages (or sites in this case) may be multiple using CSS or XSLT; all others solutions should be explicitally forbidden because they cannot ensure that the "main" page and the "alternative" ones have the same content and functionality. </blockquote> John: Right. So if there's agreement that we want to preserve this requirement in WCAG 2.0, we'll need to make sure it's in there somewhere-- presumably under 1.3?
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2004 13:53:21 UTC