- From: Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
- Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 19:41:43 +0300
- To: "'Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)'" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> Xag are a w3c rec.? I don't know if it as at rec status yet but it is one of the WAI set of guidelines Keep well L > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Roberto Scano > (IWA/HWG) > Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 7:30 PM > To: lisa@ubaccess.com; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > Subject: RE: XAG > > > > > ----- Messaggio originale ----- > Da: "Lisa Seeman"<lisa@ubaccess.com> > Inviato: 12/09/04 18.22.18 > A: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > Oggetto: XAG > > Have we missed in the robustness requirments ensuring > that the language/ > technology used is XAG (XML Accessibility guidelines) > conformant? > > > Keep well and all the best, > > Lisa > > Lisa Seeman > UB Access > Tel: +972-2-648-3782 (please note our new number) > Website: <http://www.ubaccess.com/> www.ubaccess.com > > THIS E-MAIL CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND IS > INTENDED FOR THE > RECIPIENT OF THIS E-MAIL ONLY. > > > > > [Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download > per recuperare la restante parte.] > > >
Received on Sunday, 12 September 2004 16:41:15 UTC