- From: Michael Cooper <michaelc@watchfire.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:33:24 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-ID: <D9ABD8212AFB094C855045AD80FB40DD033FBA23@1wfmail.watchfire.com>
In the HTML techniques there is a suggestion for doing as you describe [1], that is, to group links with list elements - that is our first preference of mechanisms to group links. The current wording in the technique does not talk about identifying the link group with the title attribute, but I recall we had this in mind. However, we were uncertain about present-day user agent support so weren't sure whether to mark this technique as a current technique or one that would only be useful in the future. Michael [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-HTML-TECHS-20040629.html#linkgroup s <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-HTML-TECHS-20040629.html#linkgrou ps> -----Original Message----- From: Fentress, Robert [mailto:rfentres@vt.edu] Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 5:31 PM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: List Markup to Achieve Skip Repetitive Navigation Links Functionality Hello all! I am new to the list, so I hope I don't embarrass myself straight out of the chute, but I had a question about providing users with a means of skipping repetitive navigation links. In exploring the latest version of the JAWS screen-reader, I discovered that using list markup for your navigation links provides this same functionality, since there is robust ability to navigate list structures, including the ability to completely skip them. Just add a title attribute to the <ul> or <ol> tag, describing what the list contains, and the user can choose whether or not to skip it. This being the case, is it really necessary to put a skip navigation link at the start of listed navigation? Is this unacceptable, because not enough user agents provide this functionality or has this just been overlooked? I'll be honest; my experience with screen readers is pretty much limited to JAWS. Can anyone else let me know if this would be a reliable technique? Thanks, Rob Fentress
Received on Tuesday, 6 July 2004 11:39:00 UTC