- From: Wendy Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 10:46:39 -0400
- To: wai-gl <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hello, I have summarized the issues for Guideline 1.2 and reviewed real-world multimedia examples as background for this proposal. My notes are at: <http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wcag-media-equiv.html> The following proposal is not perfect, but I hope it forms a good starting point for discussion. Guideline 1.2 Provide alternatives for multimedia content. Level 1 Success Criteria for Guideline 1.2 1. Captions are provided for prerecorded multimedia. (Editorial note: Propose that we don't create exceptions, but that policy makers create exceptions. Refer to Telecom Act of 1996 which defines "broadcast hours" for which captions are required as well as a staggered time frame for requiring captions for programs that aired before 1 January 1998) 2. Audio descriptions are provided for prerecorded multimedia. (Editorial note: Again, we shouldn't create policy. Policy makers should create it) 3. Transcripts are provided for prerecorded audio-only content that contain dialog (Editorial note: this should not apply to music with lyrics. Should this be an exception or is it clear enough?) 4. A text alternative is provided for live audio-only content by following Guideline 1.1. (Editorial note: an internet radio stream would only need to provide a description of the intent/character of the station, *not* every song they play) 5. A text alternative is provided for live video-only content by following Guideline 1.1. (Editorial note: webcams would only need a text alternative associated with the concept that the cam is pointing at, *not* every image that is captured) 6. Applications that contain multimedia should follow Guidelines 4.1 and 4.2 7. If content is rebroadcast from another medium, the accessibility features are intact. (Editorial note: this is an exception in the current draft. Many reviewers found it confusing so I made it a success criterion. Not sure this is the best approach) Level 2 Success Criteria for Guideline 1.2 1. Real-time captions are provided for live multimedia Level 3 Success Criteria for Guideline 1.2 1. Sign Language interpretations are provided for multimedia (either real-time or prerecorded) in the language of the dialog Who Benefits from Guideline 1.2 (not proposing a change at this time, although they should be cleaned up) Examples of Guideline 1.2 Example 1: a movie with audio description Transcript of the first few minutes of, "Teaching Evolution Case Studies, Bonnie Chen" (copyright WGBH and Clear Blue Sky Productions, Inc.) Describer: A title, "Teaching Evolution Case Studies. Bonnie Chen." Now, a teacher shows photographs. Bonnie Chen: These are all shot at either the Everglades...for today you just happen to be a species of wading bird that has a beak like this." Describer: wooden tongue depressors (Editorial note: will non-Americans know "wooden tongue depressors?") Example 2: a captioned tutorial A video shows how to tie a knot. The captions read, "(music) USING ROPE TO TIE KNOTS WAS AN IMPORTANT SKILL FOR THE LIKES OF SAILORS, SOLDIERS, AND WOODSMEN." From Sample Transcript Formatting by Whit Anderson Example 3: Animation of how a car engine works An animation shows how a car engine works. There is no audio and the animation is part of a tutorial that describes how an engine works. All that is needed is a description of the image. From "How car engines work: Internal combustion" (Editorial note: include some of the explanation? in fact, the explanation given is not complete, so this is hypothetical) Editorial note: Additional examples that should be developed Example 4: internet radio stream vs short interview (diff between ongoing/radio and finite/interview?) Example 5: interactive animation/slideshow (Motorola example) Example 6: webcam (africam) Example 7: music video Definitions (for the Glossary) application Content is an application if it responds to user input. (@@ all web pages are interactive under this definition. trying to highlight the difference between an application where the user agent doesn't handle the events and content where the events are handled by the user agent) audio description Audio descriptions provide access to multimedia for people who are blind or visually impaired by adding narration that describes actions, characters, scene changes and on-screen text that can not be determined from listening only to the soundtrack. This narration is limited to pauses in dialog and provided in the spoken language of the audio. audio-only presentation An audio-only presentation only contains an audio track. Examples include live, streaming radio and a recording of a screen reader demonstration. (need this?) captions Captions provide access to multimedia for people who are deaf or hard of hearing by converting a program's dialogue, sound effects, and narration into words that appear on the screen. Captions are rendered in the written language of the audio. extended audio description Audio description is squeezed into pauses in dialog and therefore limited in how much information is provided. "Extended audio description" is a method that periodically freezes the multimedia to lengthen the time available for audio description. live The events are occurring in real-time as the user is watching or participating. prerecorded Multimedia that is not live. -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI/ /--
Received on Thursday, 2 September 2004 14:47:11 UTC