- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:26:49 -0500
- To: "'Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG'" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
The requirement is that it be locatable. So multiple definitions is allowable. To be programmatically determined it would have to have a definition associated with it in some fashion (if there were multiple). But that is currently only at level 3 and we have to define how we would mark those up to make that work. One way might be to put it in the top level dictionary and make it unique there. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 3:21 AM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Re: Issue #1099 (where acronym are ambiguous...) ----- Original Message ----- From: <bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu> To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 6:52 AM Subject: NEW: Issue #1099 [This e-mail has been automatically generated. The following NEW issue was added to Bugzilla earlier today.] Acronyms cannot always be expanded programmatically. -> http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1099 Roberto Scano: Is also impossible to give a correct definition. Try to search a simple acronym in www.acronymfinder.com - for eg. CMS. Also there is another problem. With the same example, if i have in a page a description of CMS (Content Management System) and I have to expand the acronym, the first sentence is (remember that I'm italian so i need to change language): <acronym xml:lang="en" title="Content Management System">CMS</acronym> and the following sentence will only referred as: <acronym xml:lang="en">CMS</acronym> Then, if in the same page I spoke about Microsoft CMS, i need to add another acronym like this: <acronym xml:lang="en" title="Content Management Server">CMS</acronym> At this point, if I follow a discussion and i have another "CMS" acronym, how can programmatically refer to the correct acronym? I try to explain well. How can the user (with cognitive disabilities or also with assistive technologies or also a "normal" user) to know to what acronym refer the next "CMS". A solution could be - but isn't available inside the DTD, to refer to the ID of the "main acronym". Eg. <acronym id="foo" xml:lang="en" title="Content Management System">CMS</acronym> and in the second: <acronym xxxx="foo" xml:lang="en">CMS</acronym> where xxxx stays for an attribute that - at now - don't exist (eg: "ref", ...) Could this point be discussed eventually for future XHTML versions? Roberto Scano IWA/HWG
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 15:26:47 UTC