- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:33:38 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I wonder if we are talking about complex content or complex presentation. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jens Meiert Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 9:17 AM To: Yvette P. Hoitink; Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' > There are several words or phrases which I think are hard to > understand or unclear: > > Capacious > Ordered too dense > Kindred information chuncks > Observance Well, I see the problem though I think, for example, '...contains much information' is not precise or clear, either. (I think it's generally difficult to avoid words whose meaning is relative anyway.) > I also think we should include difficult language as an example > of complex content. Disagreed. For example, take "In interspecies transmissions of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, the agent has to overcome a species barrier that is largely influenced by the rate of homology between the prion proteins (PrPC) two involved species. [...]" [1] I claim that this excerpt consists of 'difficult language' (for 99% of the population), but it is /not/ complex, not per se. So I recommend not to include it in the definition. > Examples of complex content: > * content that contains much information > * content that uses words the visitor doesn't know > * content that is presented very close together > * content that consists of many parts > * content that uses different presentation styles for similar types of > information. I recommend to remove the 'content that' part since it makes this part too complex ;) Well, merging my initial and your proposal and salting it with these remarks leads us to another definition which I want to bring in as the next proposal: "Content is considered complex if it is hard to analyze or understand it. Examples of complex content include content that * contains much information; * is presented very close together; * consists of many parts; * uses different presentation styles for similar types of information. Following these guidelines helps to make content less complex." Best regards, Jens. [1] http://www.laboklin.de/l_forsch/for0p11.htm#overexpressing -- Jens Meiert Interface Architect (IxD) http://meiert.com/
Received on Thursday, 19 August 2004 14:33:38 UTC