- From: Roberto Castaldo <r.castaldo@iol.it>
- Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 10:58:41 +0200
- To: "'Gregg Vanderheiden'" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "'Roberto Scano \(IWA/HWG\)'" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>, <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, <jbrewer@w3.org>
Hi Gregg, Hi all Gregg: As long as one of the N sites meets all the guidelines -- and it is the version you get if you don't or can't do content negotiation - then it should be fine. Roberto: I am not sure to agree with this way of looking at checkpoint 11.4. We are talking about "separate" web sites with the same contents and functionalities; IMHO, checkpoint 11.4 only refers to single, isolated pages in a web site, not to an entire web site. It's true that a web site is made of many single pages, but checkpoint 11.4 doesn't speak about web sites; I do believe that WCAG message to developers is quite clear: "you may use CSS to create various skins, but do not create multiple separate web sites to address accessibility issues" Anyway, this is an interpretation problem that we should try and avoid in WCAG 2.0. My best regards, Roberto Castaldo ----------------------------------- www.Webaccessibile.Org coordinator IWA/HWG Member rcastaldo@webaccessibile.org r.castaldo@iol.it Icq 178709294 -----------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2004 09:03:22 UTC