- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:17:21 +1000
- To: Web Content Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Gregg Vanderheiden writes: > 1) How about adding freely available. Or generally available. > > <propose> > At least one [freely / generally] available version of a user agent capable > of accessing the content conforms, at a minimum, to Level A of the User > Agent Accessibility Guidelines. > </propose> I agree. If we decide to specify availability across operating systems etc., as Lee has urged, then this would appear at level 2. The desirability of this is a separate issue. > > > 2) I think we pointed to those sections of UAAG on purpose since there are > other parts that did not apply. So I don't think we can decouple. But Wendy > can comment on this more exactly. > If we don't decouple we are leaving WCAG 2.0 open to potential problems later. I think we should make a serious effort to find wording that will continue to be applicable if UAAG is updated. that
Received on Sunday, 25 July 2004 20:17:26 UTC