- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 09:31:17 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <C46A1118E0262B47BD5C202DA2490D1A03317FA1@MAIL02.austin.utexas.edu>
I'm concerned about the following item in the L1 success criteria for 1.1 (this is L1 SC 1.d in the 30 July WD, or L1 SC 3.d in the version I proposed earlier today [1]): <blockquote> D. Multimedia alternatives are provided according to guideline 1.2; or, </blockquote> It's not clear what is meant by "multimedia alternatives." It could be: (1) Captions and audio descriptions-- the media alternatives mentioned in 1.2; or (2) Text versions of the captions and audio descriptions (because, strictly speaking, current-generation captions and audio descriptions are types of "non-text content"). If this is correct, then presumably the difference between this L1 requirement and the L3 requirement for a single document containing textual versions of the captions and audio descriptions in the order in which they occur in the multimedia is that L1 does not require that these text alternatives be compiled in a single document. On the assumption that the intended meaning was something like (2) above, I propose the following: <proposed> D. Captions and audio descriptions required under guideline 1.2 are provided in machine-readable form (e.g., as text); or </proposed> John "Good design is accessible design." John Slatin, Ph.D. Director, Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/ <http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/>
Received on Monday, 9 August 2004 14:31:18 UTC