- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 14:47:40 +1000
- To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- CC: Web Content Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Gregg correctly points out that the proposal should be redrafted to clarify that the requirements apply to the content and to the technologies in which it is written. This was true of my original proposal but, as Gregg indicated, this wasn't made plain in the wording. I won't have any further time to work on this for a while, due to other commitments. <proposed> Guideline 4.2: Use technologies supported by software that meets accessibility requirements. Success criteria for guideline 4.2 Level 1: 1. The content is implemented using technologies that are supported by at least one user agent which meets the default set of requirements for conformance to Level A of the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. 2. Each of the technologies minimally required to create a functional presentation of the content is listed in the conformance profile of at least one user agent that conforms to UAAG 1.0. 3. All of the following statements are true with respect to the content and at least one user agent conforming to UAAG 1.0: a. If the content provides visual styling, then the user agent's UAAG 1.0 conformance profile includes the VisualText label. b. If the content contains at least one image, the user agent's UAAG 1.0 conformance profile includes the Image label. c. If the content contains at least one animated image, then the user agent's UAAG 1.0 conformance profile includes the Animation label. d. If the content contains audio, then the user agent's UAAG 1.0 conformance profile includes the Audio label. e. If the content requires support for author-defined event handlers in order to be operable, the user agent's UAAG 1.0 conformance profile includes the Events label. </proposed>
Received on Saturday, 11 September 2004 04:47:59 UTC