- From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:07:52 +0200
- To: <lguarino@adobe.com>, "Roberto Castaldo" <r.castaldo@iol.it>
- Cc: "'John M Slatin'" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, "'Gregg Vanderheiden'" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <ij@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, <jbrewer@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: <lguarino@adobe.com> To: "Roberto Castaldo" <r.castaldo@iol.it> Cc: "'John M Slatin'" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>; "'Gregg Vanderheiden'" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>; "'Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)'" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>; <ij@w3.org>; <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; <jbrewer@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 3:53 PM Subject: Re: R: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites Are we really proposing modifications to WCAG 1.0 at this point? Forbidding other solutions seems like we are narrowing the original guideline. Roberto Scano: What I propose is to make "clear" the note for "after the best efforts...".
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2004 14:08:15 UTC