- From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 10:30:49 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 11:24:17 +0300, Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il> wrote: > > At 08:24 PM 7/17/2004, you wrote: > > >I think "generally" most accessibility problems come down making text > > or > > >text alternative available to user agents, so I can't argue with the > > >statement that "Generally it's the same stuff that makes other stuff > > >inaccessible, people are just more likely to do it with scripting". > > For example - when does /should new content get the focus? If all new > content get focus then your screen reader continuously jumps back to > your silly script that changes images at the top of the page every 10 > seconds. On the other hand if all new content does not get focus then > how will the user know when important content has been created? Of course, but focus changes etc. are still parts of other specs. It's just easier to do with script. > Also Document.write is a classic way to create illegal code starting in > the middle of a tag- I don't see what you mean - you get the same DOM with document.write as you would've with a particular load of crap created inline - okay you don't get validation on the doc.write stuff, but you still get crap. > maybe that needs a warning, maybe to recommend > only use of DOM core. It's not possible to only use DOM core, they neglected to specify a number of key things. Recommending not using document.write is sensible though. Cheers, Jim.
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2004 05:31:09 UTC