- From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 12:10:12 -0500
- To: "Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)" <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>, "Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>, "WCAG List" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, w3c-wai-au@w3.org
- cc: w3c-ac-forum@w3.org
Sorry -- typo in quoted definition fixed below: -----Original Message----- From: w3c-ac-forum-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-ac-forum-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004 12:02 PM To: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG; WCAG List; w3c-wai-au@w3.org Cc: w3c-ac-forum@w3.org Subject: RE: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? Webster's Third New International Dictionary provides the following definition of "invention", Specif, U.S. patent law: a device or process that is not only novel and useful but that reflects creative genius, makes a distinct contribution to and advances science, is recognized by masters of science as such an advance and reveals more than the skill of expert artisans or mechanics in discovering new and useful gadgets or processes of wide commercial application. Is there some way that the W3C can influence the US Patent office to stop doing this kind of thing? Just as a wild speculation -- I have no doubt that wiser heads can come up with something better -- could the W3C bring suit, based on patents such as this that clearly violate any reasonable understanding of the purpose of patents, claiming that such patents materially damage the interests of the organization and of society at large? In general, it seems to me that it would be more effective in the long term to try to deal with the source of the problem rather than each instance as it arises. -----Original Message----- From: w3c-ac-forum-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-ac-forum-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004 1:55 AM To: WCAG List; w3c-wai-au@w3.org Cc: w3c-ac-forum@w3.org Subject: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL &p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,785,865.WKU.&OS=PN/6,785, 865&RS=PN/6,785,865 United States Patent 6,785,865 Cote , et al. August 31, 2004 Discoverability and navigation of hyperlinks via tabs Abstract A user may discover and navigate among hyperlinks through the use of a keyboard. For example, a user may press a tab key to discover and navigate to a first hyperlink that is part of a hypertext document. The first hyperlink is, in response, given focus and a focus shape is drawn around the text or graphics for the hot region of the hyperlink. If the user again presses the tab key, the next hyperlink is given focus and a focus shape (i.e., an outline that surrounds the next hyperlink) is drawn around the next hyperlink. A user may also tab to a placeholder for an image in order to make a decision whether the image should be downloaded or not. --- How this will involve the WAI (WCAG, ATAG and UAAG) base requirement that says that all the functionality must be accessible by keyboard, coherent navigation by keyboard, etc. etc.? Can any Microsoft rep. inform about this? P.S. I've put W3C AC Forum in cc. Thanks a lot! Roberto Scano (rscano@iwa-italy.org) IWA/HWG International Project Manager and EMEA Coordinator International Webmasters Association / HTML Writers Guild W3C Advisory Commitee Representative for IWA/HWG W3C WCAG Working Group Member - W3C ATAG Working Group Member http://www.iwanet.org - http://www.hwg.org E-Mail: emea@iwanet.org - w3c-rep@iwanet.org --------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 6 September 2004 17:10:58 UTC