RE: Last Call
Comments on Canonical XML
Join Our Referral Directory.
RE: TALLY and New POLL: Fwd: Proposal RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes
TALLY and New POLL: Fwd: Proposal RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes
TALLY and New POLL: Fwd: Proposal RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes
- AW: TALLY and New POLL: Fwd: Proposal RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes
- Re: TALLY and New POLL: Fwd: Proposal RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes
Teleconferences
Fwd: Call for Participation: XML Encryption Workshop
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-09.txt
IMPORTANT: Fwd: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes
Latest Version of XML Signature Specification (2nd Last Call)
Forthcoming XML Signature Last Call 2nd
Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes
- RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes
- Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes
- Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes
- RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes
- AW: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes
- Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes
- Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes
- Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes
- Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes
Consensus on RSA signature structure
No XMLDSIG teleconference today
Canonical XML comment (example 3.4)
Canonical XML comment (attributes in xml namespace)
Canonical XML comment (example 3.6)
Canonical XML Comment (CDATA)
next face to face meeting
Re: Last Call (WD-xml-c14n-20000907)
Wording of XPath relative namespace URI errata
- RE: Wording of XPath relative namespace URI errata
- RE: Wording of XPath relative namespace URI errata
Implicit Parsing and Serialization in New Processing Model
[Fwd: W3C XML Plenary Decision on relative URI References In namespace declarations]
comments on the XML Canonical specification
Newbie comments about Canonical XML
Fwd: Call for Implementation: XML Base Version 1.0 Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
WG: Poll: RSA structure
New Canonical XML Draft and Last Call Issues Resolution
Merged Copy
X509Data with improved example
Poll: RSA structure
000907-tele Minutes
further revised RetrievalMethod
7 September Conference Call info
XPath question
minutes of 31 August 2000 Teleconference
Final tweaks to URI #xpointer and to XPath Transform
Using DOMHASH with XML DSig
Re: AW: AW: Mixed Content Model for Transform?
FYI: XML Media Types draft-murata-xml-07.txt
August 31st Telecon Agenda
CanonicalizationMethod in draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-08.txt
Mixed Content Model for Transform?
C14n and inherited namespaces (again) (sorry)
Chained X.509 example
Detached signatures and HTTP Redirects
- Re: Detached signatures and HTTP Redirects
- RE: Detached signatures and HTTP Redirects
- RE: Detached signatures and HTTP Redirects
- Re: Detached signatures and HTTP Redirects
RE: Why isn't KeyInfo inside SignedInfo [Attn: Brian L.]
- RE: Why isn't KeyInfo inside SignedInfo [Attn: Brian L.]
- RE: Why isn't KeyInfo inside SignedInfo [Attn: Brian L.]
XMLDSIG RSA signatures
- AW: XMLDSIG RSA signatures
- RE: XMLDSIG RSA signatures
- RE: XMLDSIG RSA signatures
- RE: XMLDSIG RSA signatures
- RE: XMLDSIG RSA signatures
- RE: XMLDSIG RSA signatures
- Re: XMLDSIG RSA signatures
- RE: XMLDSIG RSA signatures
Insignificant whitespace
Why isn't KeyInfo inside SignedInfo
C14n and Default namespace
non node-set result of XPath transform
Errors in Section SignatureProperties
"final" RetrievalMethod
Draft Minutes of 24 August 2000 Teleconference
- Re: Draft Minutes of 24 August 2000 Teleconference
- Re: Draft Minutes of 24 August 2000 Teleconference
here() function
Relative namespace URIs in C14N
Canonicalization
Agenda for Aug 24th con call
new RetrievalMethod section
Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms
- Re: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms
- Re: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms
- AW: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms
- Re: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms
UTF-8 and BOM
- Re: UTF-8 and BOM
- Re: UTF-8 and BOM
- Re: UTF-8 and BOM
- Re: UTF-8 and BOM
- RE: UTF-8 and BOM
- RE: UTF-8 and BOM
re-tweaked X509Data
Reminder: XML Encryption Interest Group Meeting
thoughts on X509Data
000817 Draft Minutes
XSLT
RetrievalMethod
RE: Interop Issues
Tentative Aug 17th con call Agenda
2nd edition of XML 1.0 Standard
RE: New proposed fix for here()
- RE: New proposed fix for here()
- RE: New proposed fix for here()
- RE: New proposed fix for here()
- RE: New proposed fix for here()
XML-Query and Canonical XML
X509Data tweaks
- RE: X509Data tweaks
- RE: X509Data tweaks
- RE: X509Data tweaks
- RE: X509Data tweaks
- RE: X509Data tweaks
- Re: X509Data tweaks
- RE: X509Data tweaks
- RE: X509Data tweaks
- RE: X509Data tweaks
- RE: X509Data tweaks
- Re: X509Data tweaks
- Re: X509Data tweaks
Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset
- Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset
- Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset
- Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset
- RE: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset
- Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset
- RE: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset
- Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset
- RE: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset
- RE: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset
- Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset
- Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset
- Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset
- RE: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset
- Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset
- RE: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset
- Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset
- RE: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset
- Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset
Section 7.1 Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition
Enveloped Signature Transform, XPath Transform: function here()
- Re: Enveloped Signature Transform, XPath Transform: function here()
- New proposed fix for here(), was RE: Enveloped Signature Transform, XPath Transform: function here()
Errors in the XML-Signature spec. examples (Namespace defaulting for attributes)
xml:base as a PI
EDI, XML & X.400?
More XMLDSIG interop sigs
RE: XML Encryption strawman proposal
FW: XML Encryption strawman proposal
Teleconfereces starting August 17th
IETF 48 Draft Minutes
SHOULD / MUST see what was signed
- RE: SHOULD / MUST see what was signed
- Re: SHOULD / MUST see what was signed
- RE: SHOULD / MUST see what was signed
Updated References
Omission of the XML Version in C14N
Last Call comments on Canonical XML
I18N Last Call comments on Canonical XML
Final Pittsburgh Interop solicition
XML Processing in Current Implementations
RE: DSig comments on XML Base
- RE: DSig comments on XML Base
- How XML data objects are hashed
- RE: DSig comments on XML Base
- RE: DSig comments on XML Base
- RE: DSig comments on XML Base
- RE: DSig comments on XML Base
- RE: DSig comments on XML Base
Merlin Hughs example, interoperation
typo
Re:
XML Base comment
Errors and Questions
Agenda for Pittsburgh IETF
XMLDSIG interop sample signature and resources
[w3c-ietf-xmldsig] <none>
Updated IBM Implementation
Enumerated XML-Signature Conformance Requirements
XSL Transform
- RE: XSL Transform
- RE: XSL Transform
- RE: XSL Transform
- RE: XSL Transform
- RE: XSL Transform
- RE: XSL Transform
- RE: XSL Transform
- RE: XSL Transform
- RE: XSL Transform
- RE: XSL Transform
IETF Time Slot
RE: CanonicalizationMethod
DTD Structures (Was: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF)
Re: CanonicalizationMethod
iLumin and XML Dig Sigs
Section 4.3.3 (empty URI)
XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here()
- Re: XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here()
XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF
- Re: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF
- RE: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF
- RE: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF
- Re: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF
- Re: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF
- RE: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF
- PKCS1 in XML DSIG
X509Data element
minor comments for WD-xml-c14n-20000710
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-08.txt
XML Signature Section 4.4 (KeyInfo)
- RE: XML Signature Section 4.4 (KeyInfo)
- RE: XML Signature Section 4.4 (KeyInfo)
- RE: XML Signature Section 4.4 (KeyInfo)
- RE: XML Signature Section 4.4 (KeyInfo)
[w3c-ietf-xmldsig] <none>
Latest XML Signature Specification
RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft.
- RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft.
- RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft.
- RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft.
- RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft.
- RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft.
- RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft.
- RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft.
- RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft.
- RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft.
- RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft.
- RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft.
- RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft.
- RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft.
- RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft.
- RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft.
namespace question
Potentially Relevant XML Signature Patent
Re: Where would the appropriate place to identify a "Role" of a x509d ata subject?
Canonical XML Last Call
Where would the appropriate place to identify a "Role" of a x509d ata subject?
Re: X509Data element
Re: Clarify `UTF-8'
enveloped-signature algorithm
Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition
- Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition
- Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition
- Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition
- Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition
Encoding of 509 serial # and SKI
- Re: Encoding of 509 serial # and SKI
- Re: Encoding of 509 serial # and SKI
- RE: Encoding of 509 serial # and SKI