w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org from July to September 2000 by date

Friday, 29 September 2000

• Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft tgindin@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 26 September 2000

• RE: Last Call Doug Bunting

Friday, 29 September 2000

• Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft TAMURA Kent

Thursday, 28 September 2000

• Re: TALLY and New POLL: Fwd: Proposal RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Comments on Canonical XML TAMURA Kent

Tuesday, 26 September 2000

• Join Our Referral Directory. Howard Peterman

Monday, 25 September 2000

• Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes James Clark
• Re: TALLY and New POLL: Fwd: Proposal RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes Martin J. Duerst

Saturday, 23 September 2000

• AW: TALLY and New POLL: Fwd: Proposal RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes Gregor Karlinger

Friday, 22 September 2000

• RE: TALLY and New POLL: Fwd: Proposal RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• TALLY and New POLL: Fwd: Proposal RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• TALLY and New POLL: Fwd: Proposal RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Thursday, 21 September 2000

• Proposal RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes John Boyer
• Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes Mark Bartel
• Re: AW: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: AW: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: PKCS1 in XML DSIG tgindin@us.ibm.com
• Teleconferences Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: PKCS1 in XML DSIG Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Fwd: Call for Participation: XML Encryption Workshop Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• PKCS1 in XML DSIG Steve Wang
• Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes Martin J. Duerst
• AW: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes Gregor Karlinger

Wednesday, 20 September 2000

• Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes Mark Bartel
• Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes merlin
• AW: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes Gregor Karlinger
• RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes Petteri Stenius
• Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes Mark Bartel
• Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes Martin J. Duerst

Tuesday, 19 September 2000

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

Monday, 18 September 2000

• IMPORTANT: Fwd: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Latest Version of XML Signature Specification (2nd Last Call) Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Consensus on RSA signature structure Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Consensus on RSA signature structure Juergen Brauckmann

Friday, 15 September 2000

• Forthcoming XML Signature Last Call 2nd Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes John Boyer
• Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• AW: Canonical XML comment (example 3.4) Gregor Karlinger

Thursday, 14 September 2000

• RE: Canonical XML comment (example 3.4) John Boyer
• Consensus on RSA signature structure Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• No XMLDSIG teleconference today Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Canonical XML comment (example 3.4) Gregor Karlinger

Wednesday, 13 September 2000

• RE: Wording of XPath relative namespace URI errata John Boyer
• RE: Canonical XML Comment (CDATA) John Boyer
• RE: Canonical XML comment (attributes in xml namespace) John Boyer
• AW: Canonical XML Comment (CDATA) Gregor Karlinger
• Canonical XML comment (attributes in xml namespace) Gregor Karlinger
• RE: Canonical XML comment (example 3.6) John Boyer
• RE: Canonical XML Comment (CDATA) John Boyer
• Canonical XML comment (example 3.6) Gregor Karlinger
• Canonical XML Comment (CDATA) Gregor Karlinger

Tuesday, 12 September 2000

• Re: next face to face meeting Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• next face to face meeting Ken Goldman
• RE: Plenary John Boyer
• RE: C14N: Non-absolutized URIs John Boyer
• Re: Last Call (WD-xml-c14n-20000907) Susan Lesch
• RE: Wording of XPath relative namespace URI errata Kay Michael
• Wording of XPath relative namespace URI errata James Clark
• Re: C14N: Non-absolutized URIs James Clark
• RE: C14N: Non-absolutized URIs Martin J. Duerst
• RE: C14N: Non-absolutized URIs John Boyer

Monday, 11 September 2000

• Implicit Parsing and Serialization in New Processing Model Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: C14N: Non-absolutized URIs Jonathan Marsh
• C14N: Non-absolutized URIs John Boyer
• Re: Poll: RSA structure tgindin@us.ibm.com
• [Fwd: W3C XML Plenary Decision on relative URI References In namespace declarations] Dan Connolly
• Re: comments on the XML Canonical specification Lauren Wood
• Re: Newbie comments about Canonical XML Eric van der Vlist
• Re: comments on the XML Canonical specification Eric van der Vlist
• RE: comments on the XML Canonical specification John Boyer
• Re: comments on the XML Canonical specification Lauren Wood
• comments on the XML Canonical specification Lauren Wood
• RE: comments on the XML Canonical specification John Boyer
• RE: Poll: RSA structure Barb Fox
• RE: Newbie comments about Canonical XML John Boyer
• Re: Poll: RSA structure Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Saturday, 9 September 2000

• Newbie comments about Canonical XML Eric van der Vlist

Friday, 8 September 2000

• RE: Merged Copy Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Merged Copy John Boyer
• RE: XPath question John Boyer
• Fwd: Call for Implementation: XML Base Version 1.0 Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: xml_dsig, C14N and comments John Boyer
• xml_dsig, C14N and comments Juergen Brauckmann
• WG: Poll: RSA structure Gregor Karlinger
• AW: XPath question Gregor Karlinger
• RE: Merged Copy Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: X509Data with improved example Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Merged Copy John Boyer

Thursday, 7 September 2000

• New Canonical XML Draft and Last Call Issues Resolution Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: X509Data with improved example Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Merged Copy Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Detached signatures and HTTP Redirects Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: X509Data with improved example Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• X509Data with improved example Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Poll: RSA structure Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• 000907-tele Minutes Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: further revised RetrievalMethod Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: further revised RetrievalMethod Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• RE: XPath question John Boyer
• Re: further revised RetrievalMethod Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• further revised RetrievalMethod Donald Eastlake 3rd
• Re: AW: AW: Mixed Content Model for Transform? Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• 7 September Conference Call info Donald Eastlake 3rd
• XPath question Gregor Karlinger

Wednesday, 6 September 2000

• Re: minutes of 31 August 2000 Teleconference Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: minutes of 31 August 2000 Teleconference TAMURA Kent

Tuesday, 5 September 2000

• Re: minutes of 31 August 2000 Teleconference Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• minutes of 31 August 2000 Teleconference Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Monday, 4 September 2000

• Re: Using DOMHASH with XML DSig TAMURA Kent
• Re: Using DOMHASH with XML DSig Juergen Brauckmann
• Re: Using DOMHASH with XML DSig TAMURA Kent

Saturday, 2 September 2000

• Final tweaks to URI #xpointer and to XPath Transform John Boyer

Friday, 1 September 2000

• Using DOMHASH with XML DSig Ambarish Malpani
• Re: AW: AW: Mixed Content Model for Transform? Martin J. Duerst
• RE: AW: AW: Mixed Content Model for Transform? John Boyer
• Re: AW: AW: Mixed Content Model for Transform? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• AW: Mixed Content Model for Transform? Gregor Karlinger

Thursday, 31 August 2000

• FYI: XML Media Types draft-murata-xml-07.txt Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Mixed Content Model for Transform? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: CanonicalizationMethod in draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-08.txt Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• August 31st Telecon Agenda Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: "final" RetrievalMethod Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• RE: C14n and inherited namespaces (again) (sorry) John Boyer
• CanonicalizationMethod in draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-08.txt Juergen Brauckmann
• Mixed Content Model for Transform? Gregor Karlinger

Wednesday, 30 August 2000

• RE: Detached signatures and HTTP Redirects Brian LaMacchia
• Re: C14n and inherited namespaces (again) (sorry) merlin
• Re: C14n and inherited namespaces (again) (sorry) merlin
• C14n and inherited namespaces (again) (sorry) merlin
• Re: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms merlin
• RE: Detached signatures and HTTP Redirects Philip Hallam-Baker
• RE: XMLDSIG RSA signatures Philip Hallam-Baker
• Re: XMLDSIG RSA signatures merlin
• RE: Why isn't KeyInfo inside SignedInfo [Attn: Brian L.] Ed Simon
• AW: C14n and Default namespace Gregor Karlinger
• AW: XMLDSIG RSA signatures Gregor Karlinger

Tuesday, 29 August 2000

• Re: Insignificant whitespace Martin J. Duerst

Wednesday, 30 August 2000

• Re: Detached signatures and HTTP Redirects Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 29 August 2000

• Chained X.509 example tgindin@us.ibm.com
• c14n and normalize-space(), was RE: Insignificant whitespace John Boyer
• RE: Why isn't KeyInfo inside SignedInfo [Attn: Brian L.] John Boyer
• Detached signatures and HTTP Redirects Brian LaMacchia
• RE: Why isn't KeyInfo inside SignedInfo [Attn: Brian L.] Ed Simon
• Re: Draft Minutes of 24 August 2000 Teleconference Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: "final" RetrievalMethod Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: AW: Errors in Section SignatureProperties Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Insignificant whitespace John Boyer
• Re: XMLDSIG RSA signatures Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms John Boyer
• Re: XMLDSIG RSA signatures merlin
• RE: XMLDSIG RSA signatures Philip Hallam-Baker
• RE: C14n and Default namespace John Boyer
• Re: XMLDSIG RSA signatures Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: XMLDSIG RSA signatures Philip Hallam-Baker
• Re: XMLDSIG RSA signatures merlin
• Re: XMLDSIG RSA signatures merlin
• RE: XMLDSIG RSA signatures Philip Hallam-Baker
• RE: XMLDSIG RSA signatures Barb Fox
• Re: XMLDSIG RSA signatures merlin
• RE: XMLDSIG RSA signatures Barb Fox
• AW: XMLDSIG RSA signatures Gregor Karlinger
• XMLDSIG RSA signatures merlin
• Re: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms merlin
• AW: C14n and Default namespace Gregor Karlinger
• AW: Errors in Section SignatureProperties Gregor Karlinger
• Insignificant whitespace Petteri Stenius
• Why isn't KeyInfo inside SignedInfo John Boyer

Monday, 28 August 2000

• C14n and Default namespace John Boyer
• non node-set result of XPath transform John Boyer
• Re: Errors in Section SignatureProperties Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: "final" RetrievalMethod merlin
• Errors in Section SignatureProperties Gregor Karlinger

Saturday, 26 August 2000

• RE: UTF-8 and BOM Martin J. Duerst

Friday, 25 August 2000

• "final" RetrievalMethod Donald Eastlake 3rd
• RE: UTF-8 and BOM John Boyer
• RE: UTF-8 and BOM tgindin@us.ibm.com
• Tweaked New attachment, was RE: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms John Boyer
• RE: UTF-8 and BOM John Boyer
• RE: UTF-8 and BOM tgindin@us.ibm.com
• RE: UTF-8 and BOM John Boyer
• Re: UTF-8 and BOM Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• AW: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms Gregor Karlinger
• RE: UTF-8 and BOM Martin J. Duerst
• Re: Draft Minutes of 24 August 2000 Teleconference Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Thursday, 24 August 2000

• Draft Minutes of 24 August 2000 Teleconference Donald Eastlake 3rd
• Re: here() function Eve L. Maler
• here() function John Boyer
• Comments omitted, was RE: Interop Issues John Boyer
• Relative namespace URIs in C14N Brian LaMacchia
• Re: Canonicalization tgindin@us.ibm.com
• Re: AW: new RetrievalMethod section Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Canonicalization Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Canonicalization Gregor Karlinger
• AW: new RetrievalMethod section Gregor Karlinger
• AW: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms Gregor Karlinger

Wednesday, 23 August 2000

• Agenda for Aug 24th con call Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• new RetrievalMethod section Donald Eastlake
• RE: UTF-8 and BOM John Boyer
• Re: UTF-8 and BOM tgindin@us.ibm.com
• RE: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms John Boyer
• AW: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms Gregor Karlinger
• Re: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms TAMURA Kent
• Re: UTF-8 and BOM Martin J. Duerst
• Re: UTF-8 and BOM TAMURA Kent

Tuesday, 22 August 2000

• Re: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: UTF-8 and BOM tgindin@us.ibm.com
• Re: UTF-8 and BOM Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms John Boyer
• UTF-8 and BOM John Boyer
• RE: New proposed fix for here() John Boyer
• Re: New proposed fix for here() TAMURA Kent

Monday, 21 August 2000

• Re: RetrievalMethod Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• re-tweaked X509Data Donald Eastlake
• Re: xml:base as a PI Martin J. Duerst

Saturday, 19 August 2000

• RE: XSLT Martin J. Duerst

Friday, 18 August 2000

• Re: RetrievalMethod merlin
• Re: RetrievalMethod Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• RE: XSLT Ed Simon
• RE: XSLT John Boyer
• Re: XSLT Martin J. Duerst
• Re: Interop Issues TAMURA Kent

Thursday, 17 August 2000

• Reminder: XML Encryption Interest Group Meeting Barb Fox
• Re: thoughts on X509Data Kevin Regan
• Re: thoughts on X509Data tgindin@us.ibm.com
• thoughts on X509Data Kevin Regan
• 000817 Draft Minutes Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: XSLT Ed Simon
• XSLT John Boyer
• Re: X509Data tweaks tgindin@us.ibm.com
• Re: RetrievalMethod merlin
• RetrievalMethod Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: New proposed fix for here() Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: New proposed fix for here() merlin
• Re: X509Data tweaks Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: X509Data tweaks Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: New proposed fix for here() Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Interop Issues TAMURA Kent
• Re: New proposed fix for here() TAMURA Kent

Wednesday, 16 August 2000

• Re: X509Data tweaks Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Interop Issues Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset Paul Hoffman / IMC
• RE: X509Data tweaks tgindin@us.ibm.com
• RE: X509Data tweaks Kevin Regan
• Tentative Aug 17th con call Agenda Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• RE: X509Data tweaks Kevin Regan
• Re: X509Data tweaks Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• RE: New proposed fix for here() Kevin Regan
• RE: X509Data tweaks Kevin Regan
• Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: X509Data tweaks tgindin@us.ibm.com
• Re: SHOULD / MUST see what was signed Don Davis
• RE: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset Tim Bray
• RE: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset John Boyer
• Re: X509Data tweaks Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: X509Data tweaks Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• AW: New proposed fix for here() Gregor Karlinger
• RE: New proposed fix for here() Martin J. Duerst

Tuesday, 15 August 2000

• RE: New proposed fix for here() John Boyer
• RE: New proposed fix for here() Kevin Regan
• RE: New proposed fix for here() John Boyer
• 2nd edition of XML 1.0 Standard Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• RE: New proposed fix for here() Petteri Stenius

Monday, 14 August 2000

• Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset Dan Connolly

Saturday, 12 August 2000

• Re: New proposed fix for here(), was RE: Enveloped Signature Transform, XPath Transform: function here() merlin
• RE: X509Data tweaks Brian LaMacchia
• RE: X509Data tweaks Brian LaMacchia
• RE: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset John Boyer

Friday, 11 August 2000

• RE: X509Data tweaks Kevin Regan
• RE: X509Data tweaks tgindin@us.ibm.com
• XML-Query and Canonical XML Massimo Marchiori
• RE: X509Data tweaks Brian LaMacchia
• Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• New proposed fix for here(), was RE: Enveloped Signature Transform, XPath Transform: function here() John Boyer
• RE: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset John Boyer
• X509Data tweaks Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Errors in the XML-Signature spec. examples (Namespace defaulting for attributes) Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Section 7.1 Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset Dan Connolly
• Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset Tim Bray
• Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset John Boyer
• RE: Errors in the XML-Signature spec. examples (Namespace defaulting for attributes) John Boyer
• Section 7.1 Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Enveloped Signature Transform, XPath Transform: function here() merlin
• AW: Errors in the XML-Signature spec. examples (Namespace defaulting for attributes) Gregor Karlinger
• Re: Errors in the XML-Signature spec. examples (Namespace defaulting for attributes) Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Enveloped Signature Transform, XPath Transform: function here() Gregor Karlinger
• Errors in the XML-Signature spec. examples (Namespace defaulting for attributes) Gregor Karlinger
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition Martin J. Duerst
• xml:base as a PI John Boyer

Thursday, 10 August 2000

• EDI, XML & X.400? Paul L. Terzulli
• More XMLDSIG interop sigs merlin

Wednesday, 9 August 2000

• RE: XML Encryption strawman proposal Barb Fox
• RE: Omission of the XML Version in C14N John Boyer
• Re: Enumerated XML-Signature Conformance Requirements Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Omission of the XML Version in C14N by way of
• FW: XML Encryption strawman proposal Ed Simon

Tuesday, 8 August 2000

• RE: SHOULD / MUST see what was signed Ed Simon
• Teleconfereces starting August 17th Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Wednesday, 9 August 2000

• Re: SHOULD / MUST see what was signed Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Tuesday, 8 August 2000

• RE: SHOULD / MUST see what was signed John Boyer

Monday, 7 August 2000

• IETF 48 Draft Minutes Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Friday, 4 August 2000

• SHOULD / MUST see what was signed Don Davis

Wednesday, 2 August 2000

• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Updated References Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: XSL Transform merlin
• Re: Fix for RE: XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here() merlin
• Re: Fix for RE: XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here() Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: XSL Transform Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Tuesday, 1 August 2000

• RE: Omission of the XML Version in C14N John Boyer

Monday, 31 July 2000

• Omission of the XML Version in C14N muraw3c@attglobal.net

Tuesday, 1 August 2000

• RE: XML Processing in Current Implementations Ed Simon
• Re: XML Processing in Current Implementations Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: XML Processing in Current Implementations Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Last Call comments on Canonical XML Martin J. Duerst
• I18N Last Call comments on Canonical XML Martin J. Duerst
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition Martin J. Duerst

Monday, 31 July 2000

• Final Pittsburgh Interop solicition Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• RE: AW: Errors and Questions Kevin Regan
• RE: AW: Errors and Questions Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: AW: Errors and Questions Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: CanonicalizationMethod Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: CanonicalizationMethod Thomas Maslen

Saturday, 29 July 2000

• Re: XML Processing in Current Implementations TAMURA Kent
• Re: AW: Errors and Questions John Messing

Friday, 28 July 2000

• RE: DSig comments on XML Base Martin J. Duerst
• RE: DSig comments on XML Base Martin J. Duerst
• Re: XML Base comment Martin J. Duerst
• RE: AW: Errors and Questions tgindin@us.ibm.com
• RE: AW: Errors and Questions Brian LaMacchia
• RE: Possible solution for XML Base problem John Boyer
• Possible solution for XML Base problem John Boyer
• RE: AW: Errors and Questions Kevin Regan
• Re: AW: Errors and Questions tgindin@us.ibm.com
• XML Processing in Current Implementations Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Thursday, 27 July 2000

• Re: Valid XML and Schema Normative? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: How XML data objects are hashed Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: AW: Errors and Questions Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: DSig comments on XML Base Kevin Regan
• RE: DSig comments on XML Base Jonathan Marsh
• RE: DSig comments on XML Base John Boyer
• RE: DSig comments on XML Base Jonathan Marsh
• How XML data objects are hashed Steve Wang
• Re: Valid XML and Schema Normative? Ken Goldman
• RE: Errors and Questions Barb Fox
• RE: DSig comments on XML Base John Boyer
• RE: DSig comments on XML Base Paul Grosso
• RE: AW: Errors and Questions Mark Bartel
• AW: Errors and Questions Gregor Karlinger
• AW: Errors and Questions Gregor Karlinger
• AW: Errors and Questions Gregor Karlinger

Wednesday, 26 July 2000

• RE: Errors and Questions Barb Fox

Thursday, 27 July 2000

• AW: [w3c-ietf-xmldsig] <none> Gregor Karlinger
• Merlin Hughs example, interoperation Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• typo Carl Wallace

Wednesday, 26 July 2000

• RE: John Boyer
• Re: Paul Grosso
• XML Base comment John Boyer
• Fix for RE: XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here() John Boyer
• RE: XSL Transform Ed Simon
• RE: XSL Transform Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: XSL Transform Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: section 12 Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Errors and Questions Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: XSL Transform John Boyer
• RE: XSL Transform Ed Simon
• RE: XSL Transform Ed Simon
• Re: section 12 John Boyer
• RE: [w3c-ietf-xmldsig] <none> John Boyer
• Agenda for Pittsburgh IETF Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• RE: XSL Transform Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: XMLDSIG interop sample signature and resources Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: XSL Transform Merlin Hughes
• XMLDSIG interop sample signature and resources Merlin Hughes
• [w3c-ietf-xmldsig] <none> Gregor Karlinger
• Updated IBM Implementation TAMURA Kent

Tuesday, 25 July 2000

• RE: XSL Transform Ed Simon

Wednesday, 26 July 2000

• Enumerated XML-Signature Conformance Requirements Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Tuesday, 25 July 2000

• RE: XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here() Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: XSL Transform Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: XSL Transform Ed Simon
• XSL Transform Merlin Hughes

Monday, 24 July 2000

• Re: XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here() Kevin Regan
• Re: XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here() merlin
• RE: XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here() John Boyer
• Re: IETF Time Slot Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Schema Validity and Syntax Constraints (Was: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition ) Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• IETF Time Slot Philip Hallam-Baker
• Re: XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here() Kevin Regan
• Re: namespace question Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• RFC2553 (Re: Questions/Comments for the current draft.) TAMURA Kent
• Re: XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here() TAMURA Kent

Friday, 21 July 2000

• RE: namespace question Kevin Regan
• RE: namespace question John Boyer
• Schema Validity and Syntax Constraints (Was: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition ) Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: CanonicalizationMethod Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Thursday, 20 July 2000

• Re: CanonicalizationMethod Thomas Maslen

Wednesday, 19 July 2000

• RE: CanonicalizationMethod Brian LaMacchia
• Re: DTD Structures (Was: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF) Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• DTD Structures (Was: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF) Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: CanonicalizationMethod Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF merlin
• RE: no newlines after end-element tags in c14n ? John Boyer
• Re: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• iLumin and XML Dig Sigs Toby
• RE: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF Owen Roberts

Tuesday, 18 July 2000

• Re: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF merlin
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• RE: X509Data element Brian LaMacchia
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. Brian LaMacchia
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. tgindin@us.ibm.com
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: X509Data element Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Section 4.3.3 (empty URI) Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Section 4.3.3 (empty URI) Kevin Regan
• RE: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF Owen Roberts

Monday, 17 July 2000

• XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here() Merlin Hughes
• Re: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF Kevin Regan
• XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Saturday, 15 July 2000

• X509Data element Kevin Regan

Friday, 14 July 2000

• Re: Valid XML and Schema Normative? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Valid XML and Schema Normative? Ken Goldman
• minor comments for WD-xml-c14n-20000710 Susan Lesch

Thursday, 13 July 2000

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-08.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

Wednesday, 12 July 2000

• RE: XML Signature Section 4.4 (KeyInfo) Kevin Regan
• RE: XML Signature Section 4.4 (KeyInfo) Barb Fox
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. Barb Fox
• RE: XML Signature Section 4.4 (KeyInfo) Kevin Regan
• RE: XML Signature Section 4.4 (KeyInfo) Barb Fox
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. tgindin@us.ibm.com
• XML Signature Section 4.4 (KeyInfo) Kevin Regan
• [w3c-ietf-xmldsig] <none> Kevin Regan
• Re: namespace question Kevin Regan
• Re: namespace question Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: namespace question Kevin Regan
• Re: namespace question Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. Kevin Regan
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. Carl Ellison
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. tgindin@us.ibm.com
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. Barb Fox
• Re: Questions/Comments for the current draft. Ken Goldman
• RE: Latest XML Signature Specification Owen Roberts
• X509SubjectName Yoshiaki KAWATSURA
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. Yoshiaki KAWATSURA
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. Yoshiaki KAWATSURA
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. Yoshiaki KAWATSURA

Tuesday, 11 July 2000

• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. Kevin Regan
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. tgindin@us.ibm.com
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. Kevin Regan
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. tgindin@us.ibm.com
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. Brian LaMacchia
• Latest XML Signature Specification Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. tgindin@us.ibm.com
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. Brian LaMacchia
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. Brian LaMacchia
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. Brian LaMacchia
• Re: <X509Name>CN=Kent</X509Name> Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: <X509Name>CN=Kent</X509Name> TAMURA Kent

Monday, 10 July 2000

• namespace question Kevin Regan
• Potentially Relevant XML Signature Patent Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Where would the appropriate place to identify a "Role" of a x509d ata subject? tgindin@us.ibm.com
• Re: Clarify `UTF-8' Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• <X509Name>CN=Kent</X509Name> Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: enveloped-signature algorithm Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Canonical XML Last Call Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Where would the appropriate place to identify a "Role" of a x509d ata subject? Ken Goldman

Saturday, 8 July 2000

• Where would the appropriate place to identify a "Role" of a x509d ata subject? Lynn Sites

Monday, 10 July 2000

• RE: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition Martin J. Duerst
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition Martin J. Duerst
• RE: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition Martin J. Duerst
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition Martin J. Duerst
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition Martin J. Duerst
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition Martin J. Duerst
• Re: Clarify `UTF-8' Martin J. Duerst
• Re: Clarify `UTF-8' TAMURA Kent
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition tgindin@us.ibm.com

Sunday, 9 July 2000

• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition John Messing

Saturday, 8 July 2000

• Re: enveloped-signature algorithm Kevin Regan
• Re: Valid XML and Schema Normative? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: X509Data element Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Clarify `UTF-8' Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition John Cowan
• Re: enveloped-signature algorithm Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Friday, 7 July 2000

• enveloped-signature algorithm Kevin Regan
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition tgindin@us.ibm.com
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: samples in c14n ? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Encoding of 509 serial # and SKI Greg Whitehead
• Re: samples in c14n ? Paul Hoffman / IMC
• Re: Encoding of 509 serial # and SKI tgindin@us.ibm.com
• Re: Encoding of 509 serial # and SKI Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Encoding of 509 serial # and SKI David.Solo@citicorp.com
• Re: samples in c14n ? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• samples in c14n ? Anli Shundi

Thursday, 6 July 2000

• Re: WG Last Call on C14N (and attribute value escaping) John Cowan
• Re: WG Last Call on C14N (and attribute value escaping) Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: What's the minimum duration for last call? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• C14N Patent Declaration Request Formality Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: WG Last Call on C14N (and attribute value escaping) David Blondeau
• WG Last Call on C14N (and attribute value escaping) Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• WG Last Call on C14N (and attribute value escaping) Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Valid XML and Schema Normative? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Valid XML and Schema Normative? Ken Goldman
• Upcoming Schedule Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Interop at Pittsbugh IETF Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Valid XML and Schema Normative? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• c14n: '<' must be escaped as attribute value as well Anli Shundi
• Re: Valid XML and Schema Normative? Martin J. Duerst

Wednesday, 5 July 2000

• Valid XML and Schema Normative? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• New Namespace and Spec Status Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• #implied Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Monday, 3 July 2000

• RE: From John Boyer Doug Bunting

Sunday, 2 July 2000

• Typos and implications in WD-xml-c14n-20000613 Doug Bunting

Wednesday, 5 July 2000

• no newlines after end-element tags in c14n ? Anli Shundi

Monday, 3 July 2000

• Transform I/O is a sequence of octets TAMURA Kent
• RE: Typos and implications in WD-xml-c14n-20000613 John Boyer

Saturday, 1 July 2000

• Re: Going ahead with Candidate Rec Martin J. Duerst
• c14n John Boyer
• Xpath Transform John Boyer

Last message date: Friday, 29 September 2000 18:07:04 UTC