Re: New proposed fix for here()

I believe there is a desire from eCheck and presumably similar
protocols to be able to sign things relative to where the signature
element is.  This relates to composite documents formed from
pre-existing XMLD documents where you can't depend on using IDs
because they might conflict in the documents combined to make the
composite result.


From:  TAMURA Kent <>
Date:  Thu, 17 Aug 2000 17:01:23 +0900
Message-Id:  <>
References:  <>
In-reply-to:  Kevin Regan's message of "Wed, 16 Aug 2000 13:51:06 -0700"	<27FF>
User-Agent:  SEMI/1.13.5 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Meih=F2?=) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui)
	     Emacs/20.4 (i386-*-nt4.0.1381) MULE/4.1 (AOI) Meadow/1.10 (TSUYU)

>Do we need both of here() and the enveloped-signature transform?
>TAMURA Kent @ Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM

Received on Thursday, 17 August 2000 07:57:36 UTC