w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org from July to September 2000 by author

Ambarish Malpani

• Using DOMHASH with XML DSig (Friday, 1 September)

Anli Shundi

• samples in c14n ? (Friday, 7 July)
• c14n: '<' must be escaped as attribute value as well (Thursday, 6 July)
• no newlines after end-element tags in c14n ? (Wednesday, 5 July)

Barb Fox

• RE: Poll: RSA structure (Monday, 11 September)
• RE: XMLDSIG RSA signatures (Tuesday, 29 August)
• RE: XMLDSIG RSA signatures (Tuesday, 29 August)
• Reminder: XML Encryption Interest Group Meeting (Thursday, 17 August)
• RE: XML Encryption strawman proposal (Wednesday, 9 August)
• RE: Errors and Questions (Thursday, 27 July)
• RE: Errors and Questions (Wednesday, 26 July)
• RE: XML Signature Section 4.4 (KeyInfo) (Wednesday, 12 July)
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Wednesday, 12 July)
• RE: XML Signature Section 4.4 (KeyInfo) (Wednesday, 12 July)
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Wednesday, 12 July)

Brian LaMacchia

• RE: Detached signatures and HTTP Redirects (Wednesday, 30 August)
• Detached signatures and HTTP Redirects (Tuesday, 29 August)
• Relative namespace URIs in C14N (Thursday, 24 August)
• RE: X509Data tweaks (Saturday, 12 August)
• RE: X509Data tweaks (Saturday, 12 August)
• RE: X509Data tweaks (Friday, 11 August)
• RE: AW: Errors and Questions (Friday, 28 July)
• RE: CanonicalizationMethod (Wednesday, 19 July)
• RE: X509Data element (Tuesday, 18 July)
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Tuesday, 18 July)
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Tuesday, 11 July)
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Tuesday, 11 July)
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Tuesday, 11 July)
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Tuesday, 11 July)

by way of

• Re: Omission of the XML Version in C14N (Wednesday, 9 August)

Carl Ellison

• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Wednesday, 12 July)

Carl Wallace

• typo (Thursday, 27 July)

Dan Connolly

• [Fwd: W3C XML Plenary Decision on relative URI References In namespace declarations] (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: Detached signatures and HTTP Redirects (Wednesday, 30 August)
• Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset (Monday, 14 August)
• Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset (Friday, 11 August)

David Blondeau

• Re: WG Last Call on C14N (and attribute value escaping) (Thursday, 6 July)

David.Solo@citicorp.com

• Encoding of 509 serial # and SKI (Friday, 7 July)

Don Davis

• Re: SHOULD / MUST see what was signed (Wednesday, 16 August)
• SHOULD / MUST see what was signed (Friday, 4 August)

Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

• Re: TALLY and New POLL: Fwd: Proposal RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Thursday, 21 September)
• Teleconferences (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: PKCS1 in XML DSIG (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: Consensus on RSA signature structure (Monday, 18 September)
• Consensus on RSA signature structure (Thursday, 14 September)
• No XMLDSIG teleconference today (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: next face to face meeting (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: Poll: RSA structure (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: X509Data with improved example (Thursday, 7 September)
• X509Data with improved example (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: further revised RetrievalMethod (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: AW: AW: Mixed Content Model for Transform? (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: minutes of 31 August 2000 Teleconference (Wednesday, 6 September)
• minutes of 31 August 2000 Teleconference (Tuesday, 5 September)
• August 31st Telecon Agenda (Thursday, 31 August)
• Re: "final" RetrievalMethod (Thursday, 31 August)
• Re: UTF-8 and BOM (Friday, 25 August)
• Re: Draft Minutes of 24 August 2000 Teleconference (Friday, 25 August)
• Re: AW: new RetrievalMethod section (Thursday, 24 August)
• Re: Canonicalization (Thursday, 24 August)
• Agenda for Aug 24th con call (Wednesday, 23 August)
• Re: RetrievalMethod (Monday, 21 August)
• Re: RetrievalMethod (Friday, 18 August)
• RetrievalMethod (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: New proposed fix for here() (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: X509Data tweaks (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: X509Data tweaks (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: New proposed fix for here() (Thursday, 17 August)
• Tentative Aug 17th con call Agenda (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Re: X509Data tweaks (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Re: X509Data tweaks (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Re: X509Data tweaks (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset (Wednesday, 16 August)
• 2nd edition of XML 1.0 Standard (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset (Friday, 11 August)
• X509Data tweaks (Friday, 11 August)
• Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset (Friday, 11 August)
• Re: Errors in the XML-Signature spec. examples (Namespace defaulting for attributes) (Friday, 11 August)
• Section 7.1 Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition (Friday, 11 August)
• Re: Errors in the XML-Signature spec. examples (Namespace defaulting for attributes) (Friday, 11 August)
• Teleconfereces starting August 17th (Tuesday, 8 August)
• Re: XML Processing in Current Implementations (Tuesday, 1 August)
• Final Pittsburgh Interop solicition (Monday, 31 July)
• Merlin Hughs example, interoperation (Thursday, 27 July)
• Agenda for Pittsburgh IETF (Wednesday, 26 July)
• Re: XMLDSIG interop sample signature and resources (Wednesday, 26 July)
• Re: IETF Time Slot (Monday, 24 July)
• Re: Schema Validity and Syntax Constraints (Was: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition ) (Monday, 24 July)
• Re: namespace question (Monday, 24 July)
• Re: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF (Wednesday, 19 July)
• Re: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF (Wednesday, 19 July)
• Re: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF (Wednesday, 19 July)
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition (Tuesday, 18 July)
• XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF (Monday, 17 July)

Donald Eastlake

• new RetrievalMethod section (Wednesday, 23 August)
• re-tweaked X509Data (Monday, 21 August)

Donald Eastlake 3rd

• further revised RetrievalMethod (Thursday, 7 September)
• 7 September Conference Call info (Thursday, 7 September)
• "final" RetrievalMethod (Friday, 25 August)
• Draft Minutes of 24 August 2000 Teleconference (Thursday, 24 August)

Doug Bunting

• RE: Last Call (Tuesday, 26 September)
• RE: From John Boyer (Monday, 3 July)
• Typos and implications in WD-xml-c14n-20000613 (Sunday, 2 July)

Ed Simon

• RE: Why isn't KeyInfo inside SignedInfo [Attn: Brian L.] (Wednesday, 30 August)
• RE: Why isn't KeyInfo inside SignedInfo [Attn: Brian L.] (Tuesday, 29 August)
• RE: XSLT (Friday, 18 August)
• RE: XSLT (Thursday, 17 August)
• FW: XML Encryption strawman proposal (Wednesday, 9 August)
• RE: SHOULD / MUST see what was signed (Tuesday, 8 August)
• RE: XML Processing in Current Implementations (Tuesday, 1 August)
• RE: XSL Transform (Wednesday, 26 July)
• RE: XSL Transform (Wednesday, 26 July)
• RE: XSL Transform (Wednesday, 26 July)
• RE: XSL Transform (Tuesday, 25 July)
• RE: XSL Transform (Tuesday, 25 July)

Eric van der Vlist

• Re: Newbie comments about Canonical XML (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: comments on the XML Canonical specification (Monday, 11 September)
• Newbie comments about Canonical XML (Saturday, 9 September)

Eve L. Maler

• Re: here() function (Thursday, 24 August)

Greg Whitehead

• RE: Encoding of 509 serial # and SKI (Friday, 7 July)

Gregor Karlinger

• AW: TALLY and New POLL: Fwd: Proposal RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Saturday, 23 September)
• AW: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Thursday, 21 September)
• AW: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Wednesday, 20 September)
• AW: Canonical XML comment (example 3.4) (Friday, 15 September)
• Canonical XML comment (example 3.4) (Thursday, 14 September)
• AW: Canonical XML Comment (CDATA) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Canonical XML comment (attributes in xml namespace) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Canonical XML comment (example 3.6) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Canonical XML Comment (CDATA) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• WG: Poll: RSA structure (Friday, 8 September)
• AW: XPath question (Friday, 8 September)
• XPath question (Thursday, 7 September)
• AW: Mixed Content Model for Transform? (Friday, 1 September)
• Mixed Content Model for Transform? (Thursday, 31 August)
• AW: C14n and Default namespace (Wednesday, 30 August)
• AW: XMLDSIG RSA signatures (Wednesday, 30 August)
• AW: XMLDSIG RSA signatures (Tuesday, 29 August)
• AW: C14n and Default namespace (Tuesday, 29 August)
• AW: Errors in Section SignatureProperties (Tuesday, 29 August)
• Errors in Section SignatureProperties (Monday, 28 August)
• AW: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms (Friday, 25 August)
• Canonicalization (Thursday, 24 August)
• AW: new RetrievalMethod section (Thursday, 24 August)
• AW: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms (Thursday, 24 August)
• AW: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms (Wednesday, 23 August)
• AW: New proposed fix for here() (Wednesday, 16 August)
• AW: Errors in the XML-Signature spec. examples (Namespace defaulting for attributes) (Friday, 11 August)
• Enveloped Signature Transform, XPath Transform: function here() (Friday, 11 August)
• Errors in the XML-Signature spec. examples (Namespace defaulting for attributes) (Friday, 11 August)
• AW: Errors and Questions (Thursday, 27 July)
• AW: Errors and Questions (Thursday, 27 July)
• AW: Errors and Questions (Thursday, 27 July)
• AW: [w3c-ietf-xmldsig] <none> (Thursday, 27 July)
• [w3c-ietf-xmldsig] <none> (Wednesday, 26 July)

Howard Peterman

• Join Our Referral Directory. (Tuesday, 26 September)

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-09.txt (Tuesday, 19 September)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-08.txt (Thursday, 13 July)

James Clark

• Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Monday, 25 September)
• Wording of XPath relative namespace URI errata (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: C14N: Non-absolutized URIs (Tuesday, 12 September)

John Boyer

• Proposal RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Thursday, 21 September)
• RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Friday, 15 September)
• RE: Canonical XML comment (example 3.4) (Thursday, 14 September)
• RE: Wording of XPath relative namespace URI errata (Wednesday, 13 September)
• RE: Canonical XML Comment (CDATA) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• RE: Canonical XML comment (attributes in xml namespace) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• RE: Canonical XML comment (example 3.6) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• RE: Canonical XML Comment (CDATA) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• RE: Plenary (Tuesday, 12 September)
• RE: C14N: Non-absolutized URIs (Tuesday, 12 September)
• RE: C14N: Non-absolutized URIs (Tuesday, 12 September)
• C14N: Non-absolutized URIs (Monday, 11 September)
• RE: comments on the XML Canonical specification (Monday, 11 September)
• RE: comments on the XML Canonical specification (Monday, 11 September)
• RE: Newbie comments about Canonical XML (Monday, 11 September)
• RE: Merged Copy (Friday, 8 September)
• RE: XPath question (Friday, 8 September)
• RE: xml_dsig, C14N and comments (Friday, 8 September)
• RE: Merged Copy (Friday, 8 September)
• RE: XPath question (Thursday, 7 September)
• Final tweaks to URI #xpointer and to XPath Transform (Saturday, 2 September)
• RE: AW: AW: Mixed Content Model for Transform? (Friday, 1 September)
• RE: C14n and inherited namespaces (again) (sorry) (Thursday, 31 August)
• c14n and normalize-space(), was RE: Insignificant whitespace (Tuesday, 29 August)
• RE: Why isn't KeyInfo inside SignedInfo [Attn: Brian L.] (Tuesday, 29 August)
• RE: Insignificant whitespace (Tuesday, 29 August)
• RE: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms (Tuesday, 29 August)
• RE: C14n and Default namespace (Tuesday, 29 August)
• Why isn't KeyInfo inside SignedInfo (Tuesday, 29 August)
• C14n and Default namespace (Monday, 28 August)
• non node-set result of XPath transform (Monday, 28 August)
• RE: UTF-8 and BOM (Friday, 25 August)
• Tweaked New attachment, was RE: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms (Friday, 25 August)
• RE: UTF-8 and BOM (Friday, 25 August)
• RE: UTF-8 and BOM (Friday, 25 August)
• here() function (Thursday, 24 August)
• Comments omitted, was RE: Interop Issues (Thursday, 24 August)
• RE: UTF-8 and BOM (Wednesday, 23 August)
• RE: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms (Wednesday, 23 August)
• Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms (Tuesday, 22 August)
• UTF-8 and BOM (Tuesday, 22 August)
• RE: New proposed fix for here() (Tuesday, 22 August)
• RE: XSLT (Friday, 18 August)
• XSLT (Thursday, 17 August)
• RE: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset (Wednesday, 16 August)
• RE: New proposed fix for here() (Tuesday, 15 August)
• RE: New proposed fix for here() (Tuesday, 15 August)
• RE: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset (Saturday, 12 August)
• New proposed fix for here(), was RE: Enveloped Signature Transform, XPath Transform: function here() (Friday, 11 August)
• RE: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset (Friday, 11 August)
• Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset (Friday, 11 August)
• RE: Errors in the XML-Signature spec. examples (Namespace defaulting for attributes) (Friday, 11 August)
• xml:base as a PI (Friday, 11 August)
• RE: Omission of the XML Version in C14N (Wednesday, 9 August)
• RE: SHOULD / MUST see what was signed (Tuesday, 8 August)
• RE: Omission of the XML Version in C14N (Tuesday, 1 August)
• RE: Possible solution for XML Base problem (Friday, 28 July)
• Possible solution for XML Base problem (Friday, 28 July)
• RE: DSig comments on XML Base (Thursday, 27 July)
• RE: DSig comments on XML Base (Thursday, 27 July)
• RE: (Wednesday, 26 July)
• XML Base comment (Wednesday, 26 July)
• Fix for RE: XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here() (Wednesday, 26 July)
• RE: XSL Transform (Wednesday, 26 July)
• Re: section 12 (Wednesday, 26 July)
• RE: [w3c-ietf-xmldsig] <none> (Wednesday, 26 July)
• RE: XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here() (Monday, 24 July)
• RE: namespace question (Friday, 21 July)
• RE: no newlines after end-element tags in c14n ? (Wednesday, 19 July)
• RE: Typos and implications in WD-xml-c14n-20000613 (Monday, 3 July)
• c14n (Saturday, 1 July)
• Xpath Transform (Saturday, 1 July)

John Cowan

• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition (Saturday, 8 July)
• Re: WG Last Call on C14N (and attribute value escaping) (Thursday, 6 July)

John Messing

• Re: AW: Errors and Questions (Saturday, 29 July)
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition (Sunday, 9 July)

Jonathan Marsh

• RE: C14N: Non-absolutized URIs (Monday, 11 September)
• RE: DSig comments on XML Base (Thursday, 27 July)
• RE: DSig comments on XML Base (Thursday, 27 July)

Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

• RE: TALLY and New POLL: Fwd: Proposal RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Friday, 22 September)
• TALLY and New POLL: Fwd: Proposal RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Friday, 22 September)
• TALLY and New POLL: Fwd: Proposal RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: AW: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: AW: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Thursday, 21 September)
• Fwd: Call for Participation: XML Encryption Workshop (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Wednesday, 20 September)
• IMPORTANT: Fwd: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Monday, 18 September)
• Latest Version of XML Signature Specification (2nd Last Call) (Monday, 18 September)
• Forthcoming XML Signature Last Call 2nd (Friday, 15 September)
• RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Friday, 15 September)
• Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Friday, 15 September)
• Implicit Parsing and Serialization in New Processing Model (Monday, 11 September)
• RE: Merged Copy (Friday, 8 September)
• Fwd: Call for Implementation: XML Base Version 1.0 Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 8 September)
• RE: Merged Copy (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: X509Data with improved example (Friday, 8 September)
• New Canonical XML Draft and Last Call Issues Resolution (Thursday, 7 September)
• Merged Copy (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: Detached signatures and HTTP Redirects (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: X509Data with improved example (Thursday, 7 September)
• Poll: RSA structure (Thursday, 7 September)
• 000907-tele Minutes (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: further revised RetrievalMethod (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: further revised RetrievalMethod (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: minutes of 31 August 2000 Teleconference (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: AW: AW: Mixed Content Model for Transform? (Friday, 1 September)
• FYI: XML Media Types draft-murata-xml-07.txt (Thursday, 31 August)
• Re: Mixed Content Model for Transform? (Thursday, 31 August)
• Re: CanonicalizationMethod in draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-08.txt (Thursday, 31 August)
• Re: Draft Minutes of 24 August 2000 Teleconference (Tuesday, 29 August)
• Re: "final" RetrievalMethod (Tuesday, 29 August)
• Re: AW: Errors in Section SignatureProperties (Tuesday, 29 August)
• Re: XMLDSIG RSA signatures (Tuesday, 29 August)
• Re: XMLDSIG RSA signatures (Tuesday, 29 August)
• Re: Errors in Section SignatureProperties (Monday, 28 August)
• Re: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms (Tuesday, 22 August)
• Re: UTF-8 and BOM (Tuesday, 22 August)
• 000817 Draft Minutes (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: X509Data tweaks (Wednesday, 16 August)
• RE: Interop Issues (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset (Friday, 11 August)
• Re: Section 7.1 Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition (Friday, 11 August)
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition (Friday, 11 August)
• Re: Enumerated XML-Signature Conformance Requirements (Wednesday, 9 August)
• Re: SHOULD / MUST see what was signed (Wednesday, 9 August)
• IETF 48 Draft Minutes (Monday, 7 August)
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition (Wednesday, 2 August)
• Updated References (Wednesday, 2 August)
• Re: Fix for RE: XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here() (Wednesday, 2 August)
• RE: XSL Transform (Wednesday, 2 August)
• Re: XML Processing in Current Implementations (Tuesday, 1 August)
• RE: AW: Errors and Questions (Monday, 31 July)
• RE: AW: Errors and Questions (Monday, 31 July)
• Re: CanonicalizationMethod (Monday, 31 July)
• XML Processing in Current Implementations (Friday, 28 July)
• Re: Valid XML and Schema Normative? (Thursday, 27 July)
• Re: How XML data objects are hashed (Thursday, 27 July)
• Re: AW: Errors and Questions (Thursday, 27 July)
• RE: XSL Transform (Wednesday, 26 July)
• RE: XSL Transform (Wednesday, 26 July)
• Re: section 12 (Wednesday, 26 July)
• Errors and Questions (Wednesday, 26 July)
• RE: XSL Transform (Wednesday, 26 July)
• Enumerated XML-Signature Conformance Requirements (Wednesday, 26 July)
• RE: XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here() (Tuesday, 25 July)
• RE: XSL Transform (Tuesday, 25 July)
• Schema Validity and Syntax Constraints (Was: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition ) (Friday, 21 July)
• Re: CanonicalizationMethod (Friday, 21 July)
• Re: DTD Structures (Was: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF) (Wednesday, 19 July)
• DTD Structures (Was: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF) (Wednesday, 19 July)
• Re: CanonicalizationMethod (Wednesday, 19 July)
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Tuesday, 18 July)
• Re: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF (Tuesday, 18 July)
• Re: X509Data element (Tuesday, 18 July)
• Re: Section 4.3.3 (empty URI) (Tuesday, 18 July)
• Re: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF (Tuesday, 18 July)
• RE: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF (Tuesday, 18 July)
• Re: Valid XML and Schema Normative? (Friday, 14 July)
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition (Wednesday, 12 July)
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition (Wednesday, 12 July)
• Re: namespace question (Wednesday, 12 July)
• Re: namespace question (Wednesday, 12 July)
• Latest XML Signature Specification (Tuesday, 11 July)
• Re: <X509Name>CN=Kent</X509Name> (Tuesday, 11 July)
• Potentially Relevant XML Signature Patent (Monday, 10 July)
• Re: Clarify `UTF-8' (Monday, 10 July)
• <X509Name>CN=Kent</X509Name> (Monday, 10 July)
• Re: enveloped-signature algorithm (Monday, 10 July)
• Canonical XML Last Call (Monday, 10 July)
• Re: Valid XML and Schema Normative? (Saturday, 8 July)
• Re: X509Data element (Saturday, 8 July)
• Re: Clarify `UTF-8' (Saturday, 8 July)
• Re: enveloped-signature algorithm (Saturday, 8 July)
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition (Saturday, 8 July)
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition (Friday, 7 July)
• Re: samples in c14n ? (Friday, 7 July)
• Re: Encoding of 509 serial # and SKI (Friday, 7 July)
• Re: samples in c14n ? (Friday, 7 July)
• Re: WG Last Call on C14N (and attribute value escaping) (Thursday, 6 July)
• RE: What's the minimum duration for last call? (Thursday, 6 July)
• C14N Patent Declaration Request Formality (Thursday, 6 July)
• WG Last Call on C14N (and attribute value escaping) (Thursday, 6 July)
• WG Last Call on C14N (and attribute value escaping) (Thursday, 6 July)
• Re: Valid XML and Schema Normative? (Thursday, 6 July)
• Upcoming Schedule (Thursday, 6 July)
• Interop at Pittsbugh IETF (Thursday, 6 July)
• Re: Valid XML and Schema Normative? (Thursday, 6 July)
• Valid XML and Schema Normative? (Wednesday, 5 July)
• New Namespace and Spec Status (Wednesday, 5 July)
• #implied (Wednesday, 5 July)

Juergen Brauckmann

• Re: Consensus on RSA signature structure (Monday, 18 September)
• xml_dsig, C14N and comments (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: Using DOMHASH with XML DSig (Monday, 4 September)
• CanonicalizationMethod in draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-08.txt (Thursday, 31 August)

Kay Michael

• RE: Wording of XPath relative namespace URI errata (Tuesday, 12 September)

Ken Goldman

• next face to face meeting (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: Valid XML and Schema Normative? (Thursday, 27 July)
• Re: Valid XML and Schema Normative? (Friday, 14 July)
• Re: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Wednesday, 12 July)
• Re: Where would the appropriate place to identify a "Role" of a x509d ata subject? (Monday, 10 July)
• Re: Valid XML and Schema Normative? (Thursday, 6 July)

Kevin Regan

• Re: thoughts on X509Data (Thursday, 17 August)
• thoughts on X509Data (Thursday, 17 August)
• RE: X509Data tweaks (Wednesday, 16 August)
• RE: X509Data tweaks (Wednesday, 16 August)
• RE: New proposed fix for here() (Wednesday, 16 August)
• RE: X509Data tweaks (Wednesday, 16 August)
• RE: New proposed fix for here() (Tuesday, 15 August)
• RE: X509Data tweaks (Friday, 11 August)
• RE: AW: Errors and Questions (Monday, 31 July)
• RE: AW: Errors and Questions (Friday, 28 July)
• RE: DSig comments on XML Base (Thursday, 27 July)
• Re: XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here() (Monday, 24 July)
• Re: XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here() (Monday, 24 July)
• RE: namespace question (Friday, 21 July)
• Section 4.3.3 (empty URI) (Tuesday, 18 July)
• Re: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF (Monday, 17 July)
• X509Data element (Saturday, 15 July)
• RE: XML Signature Section 4.4 (KeyInfo) (Wednesday, 12 July)
• RE: XML Signature Section 4.4 (KeyInfo) (Wednesday, 12 July)
• XML Signature Section 4.4 (KeyInfo) (Wednesday, 12 July)
• [w3c-ietf-xmldsig] <none> (Wednesday, 12 July)
• Re: namespace question (Wednesday, 12 July)
• Re: namespace question (Wednesday, 12 July)
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Wednesday, 12 July)
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Tuesday, 11 July)
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Tuesday, 11 July)
• namespace question (Monday, 10 July)
• Re: enveloped-signature algorithm (Saturday, 8 July)
• enveloped-signature algorithm (Friday, 7 July)

Lauren Wood

• Re: comments on the XML Canonical specification (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: comments on the XML Canonical specification (Monday, 11 September)
• comments on the XML Canonical specification (Monday, 11 September)

Lynn Sites

• Where would the appropriate place to identify a "Role" of a x509d ata subject? (Saturday, 8 July)

Mark Bartel

• Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Wednesday, 20 September)
• RE: AW: Errors and Questions (Thursday, 27 July)

Martin J. Duerst

• Re: TALLY and New POLL: Fwd: Proposal RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Wednesday, 20 September)
• RE: C14N: Non-absolutized URIs (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: AW: AW: Mixed Content Model for Transform? (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: Insignificant whitespace (Tuesday, 29 August)
• RE: UTF-8 and BOM (Saturday, 26 August)
• RE: UTF-8 and BOM (Friday, 25 August)
• Re: UTF-8 and BOM (Wednesday, 23 August)
• Re: xml:base as a PI (Monday, 21 August)
• RE: XSLT (Saturday, 19 August)
• Re: XSLT (Friday, 18 August)
• RE: New proposed fix for here() (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition (Friday, 11 August)
• Last Call comments on Canonical XML (Tuesday, 1 August)
• I18N Last Call comments on Canonical XML (Tuesday, 1 August)
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition (Tuesday, 1 August)
• RE: DSig comments on XML Base (Friday, 28 July)
• RE: DSig comments on XML Base (Friday, 28 July)
• Re: XML Base comment (Friday, 28 July)
• RE: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition (Monday, 10 July)
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition (Monday, 10 July)
• RE: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition (Monday, 10 July)
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition (Monday, 10 July)
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition (Monday, 10 July)
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition (Monday, 10 July)
• Re: Clarify `UTF-8' (Monday, 10 July)
• Re: Valid XML and Schema Normative? (Thursday, 6 July)
• Re: Going ahead with Candidate Rec (Saturday, 1 July)

Massimo Marchiori

• XML-Query and Canonical XML (Friday, 11 August)

merlin

• Re: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: C14n and inherited namespaces (again) (sorry) (Wednesday, 30 August)
• Re: C14n and inherited namespaces (again) (sorry) (Wednesday, 30 August)
• C14n and inherited namespaces (again) (sorry) (Wednesday, 30 August)
• Re: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms (Wednesday, 30 August)
• Re: XMLDSIG RSA signatures (Wednesday, 30 August)
• Re: XMLDSIG RSA signatures (Tuesday, 29 August)
• Re: XMLDSIG RSA signatures (Tuesday, 29 August)
• Re: XMLDSIG RSA signatures (Tuesday, 29 August)
• Re: XMLDSIG RSA signatures (Tuesday, 29 August)
• XMLDSIG RSA signatures (Tuesday, 29 August)
• Re: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms (Tuesday, 29 August)
• Re: "final" RetrievalMethod (Monday, 28 August)
• Re: RetrievalMethod (Friday, 18 August)
• Re: RetrievalMethod (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: New proposed fix for here() (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: New proposed fix for here(), was RE: Enveloped Signature Transform, XPath Transform: function here() (Saturday, 12 August)
• Re: Enveloped Signature Transform, XPath Transform: function here() (Friday, 11 August)
• More XMLDSIG interop sigs (Thursday, 10 August)
• Re: XSL Transform (Wednesday, 2 August)
• Re: Fix for RE: XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here() (Wednesday, 2 August)
• Re: XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here() (Monday, 24 July)
• Re: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF (Wednesday, 19 July)
• Re: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF (Tuesday, 18 July)

Merlin Hughes

• Re: XSL Transform (Wednesday, 26 July)
• XMLDSIG interop sample signature and resources (Wednesday, 26 July)
• XSL Transform (Tuesday, 25 July)
• XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here() (Monday, 17 July)

muraw3c@attglobal.net

• Omission of the XML Version in C14N (Monday, 31 July)

Owen Roberts

• RE: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF (Wednesday, 19 July)
• RE: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF (Tuesday, 18 July)
• RE: Latest XML Signature Specification (Wednesday, 12 July)

Paul Grosso

• RE: DSig comments on XML Base (Thursday, 27 July)
• Re: (Wednesday, 26 July)

Paul Hoffman / IMC

• Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Re: samples in c14n ? (Friday, 7 July)

Paul L. Terzulli

• EDI, XML & X.400? (Thursday, 10 August)

Petteri Stenius

• RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Insignificant whitespace (Tuesday, 29 August)
• RE: New proposed fix for here() (Tuesday, 15 August)

Philip Hallam-Baker

• RE: Detached signatures and HTTP Redirects (Wednesday, 30 August)
• RE: XMLDSIG RSA signatures (Wednesday, 30 August)
• RE: XMLDSIG RSA signatures (Tuesday, 29 August)
• RE: XMLDSIG RSA signatures (Tuesday, 29 August)
• RE: XMLDSIG RSA signatures (Tuesday, 29 August)
• IETF Time Slot (Monday, 24 July)

Steve Wang

• PKCS1 in XML DSIG (Thursday, 21 September)
• How XML data objects are hashed (Thursday, 27 July)

Susan Lesch

• Re: Last Call (WD-xml-c14n-20000907) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• minor comments for WD-xml-c14n-20000710 (Friday, 14 July)

TAMURA Kent

• Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft (Friday, 29 September)
• Comments on Canonical XML (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: minutes of 31 August 2000 Teleconference (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: Using DOMHASH with XML DSig (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: Using DOMHASH with XML DSig (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms (Wednesday, 23 August)
• Re: UTF-8 and BOM (Wednesday, 23 August)
• Re: New proposed fix for here() (Tuesday, 22 August)
• Re: Interop Issues (Friday, 18 August)
• Re: Interop Issues (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: New proposed fix for here() (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: XML Processing in Current Implementations (Saturday, 29 July)
• Updated IBM Implementation (Wednesday, 26 July)
• RFC2553 (Re: Questions/Comments for the current draft.) (Monday, 24 July)
• Re: XMLDSIG proposal: enveloped signatures, xpath and here() (Monday, 24 July)
• Re: <X509Name>CN=Kent</X509Name> (Tuesday, 11 July)
• Re: Clarify `UTF-8' (Monday, 10 July)
• Transform I/O is a sequence of octets (Monday, 3 July)

tgindin@us.ibm.com

• Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: PKCS1 in XML DSIG (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: Poll: RSA structure (Monday, 11 September)
• Chained X.509 example (Tuesday, 29 August)
• RE: UTF-8 and BOM (Friday, 25 August)
• RE: UTF-8 and BOM (Friday, 25 August)
• Re: Canonicalization (Thursday, 24 August)
• Re: UTF-8 and BOM (Wednesday, 23 August)
• Re: UTF-8 and BOM (Tuesday, 22 August)
• Re: thoughts on X509Data (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: X509Data tweaks (Thursday, 17 August)
• RE: X509Data tweaks (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Re: X509Data tweaks (Wednesday, 16 August)
• RE: X509Data tweaks (Friday, 11 August)
• RE: AW: Errors and Questions (Friday, 28 July)
• Re: AW: Errors and Questions (Friday, 28 July)
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Tuesday, 18 July)
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Wednesday, 12 July)
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Wednesday, 12 July)
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Tuesday, 11 July)
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Tuesday, 11 July)
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Tuesday, 11 July)
• Re: Where would the appropriate place to identify a "Role" of a x509d ata subject? (Monday, 10 July)
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition (Monday, 10 July)
• Re: Followup on I18N Last Call comments and disposition (Friday, 7 July)
• Re: Encoding of 509 serial # and SKI (Friday, 7 July)

Thomas Maslen

• Re: CanonicalizationMethod (Monday, 31 July)
• Re: CanonicalizationMethod (Thursday, 20 July)

Tim Bray

• RE: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Re: Determining attribute uniqueness seems to require namespace prefix in Infoset (Friday, 11 August)

Toby

• iLumin and XML Dig Sigs (Wednesday, 19 July)

Yoshiaki KAWATSURA

• X509SubjectName (Wednesday, 12 July)
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Wednesday, 12 July)
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Wednesday, 12 July)
• RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft. (Wednesday, 12 July)

Last message date: Friday, 29 September 2000 18:07:04 UTC