- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 14:34:29 -0400
- To: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
[I'm forwarding this to this list because it's easier to track.] Forwarded Text ---- To: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org> From: Merlin Hughes <merlin@baltimore.ie> Subject: Re: XMLDSIG Interop in connection with 48th IETF In-reply-to: <3.0.5.32.20000718130700.00a9fd20@localhost> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 19:30:42 +0100 Status: r/reagle@w3.org/2000.07.18/13:07:00 >How do you mean broken? Kevin has pointed out one problem and alluded to >others, if you guys point them out, I'll be happy to fix them in the next >version. Some minor inconsistencies: 4.4.3 RetrievalMethod Schema has Encoding attribute on both RetrievalMethod and Type elements but DTD has Encoding attribute just on Type element. DTD correct? Then in the DTD on file, there is no Type element defined. The Schema has mandatory content for the Type element. This seems wrong because it can't then be implemented interoperably without further specification. 4.3.3.1 Transform In the schema, the "XPath" element is case-incorrect "Xpath". Merlin Hughes Baltimore Technologies, plc End Forwarded Text ---- _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Tuesday, 18 July 2000 14:34:38 UTC