- From: TAMURA Kent <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 16:12:53 +0900
- To: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>
- CC: TAMURA Kent <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
In message "Re: Clarify `UTF-8'" on 00/07/07, "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org> writes: > I'm plodding through email in my inbox for the next version and unless you > can provide a standard reference for UTF-8N we'll continue using the UTF-8 > reference in the context of the XML specification that Boyer pointed out. I asked some Unicode people about standardization of UTF-8N. But anyone did not know about it. We should use the name 'UTF-8' in the specification but I hope adding short note about no-BOM to the specification. -- TAMURA Kent @ Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM
Received on Monday, 10 July 2000 03:13:28 UTC