- From: Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 17:43:12 -0400
- To: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
- cc: lde008@dma.isg.mot.com
The call started a bit late as the toll-free and international numbers were partitioned but after about ten minutes we got them multed together... On Call: Joseph Reagle, Donald Eastlake, Merlin Hughs, & John Boyer. - KeyInfo/X509Data - there were no objections to the last version posted by Donald Eastlake which appears to be the consensus: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000JulSep/0318.html> - RetrievalMethod - there was agreement with the comments by Gregor that URI should be a mandatory attribute. Donald will change and repost. - xml:base - there was considerable discussion but it did not appear that any changes were currently needed in the canonicalization document. - Transform/URI processing model - there was a length disucssion of this and the feeling was that it requires more discussion on the mailing list of the revisions that John Boyer has posted which were in turn based on the discussions during last weeks teleconference. An important question is whether a <foo:bar#mumble> URI returns an octet string or (when the target is XML) a node set or the serialization of a node set. - qualifying attributes - After brief discussion, the conclustions were as follows: our current schema calls for attributes to not be namespace qualified. We should include a sentence indicated that qualifying the attributes we define is an error. It would be good to see if schema checks will flag such problems. - Other - - John Boyer asked people to particularly check his new text on Minimal Canonicalization and XSLT. - There was some discussion of the context when elements are extracted by XPath, etc., and then further processed. The understanding was the the context with limited to the element, and not the whole document. [I have a note that there is an action related to this for Joseph but I don't remember exactly what it is.] - Plan for progress is to get out a new canonicalization document in September and assuming it is approved as a Candidate Recommendation, a revised Syntax and Processing document will follow. It is likely that the changes we are making are sufficiently extensive that they will require a new Last Call. - There will be a con call next week to discuss some odds and ends. Donald ================================================================== Donald Eastlake 3rd +1 978-562-2827(h) dee3@torque.pothole.com 140 Forest Avenue +1 508-261-5434(w) lde008@dma.isg.mot.com Hudson, MA 01749 USA
Received on Thursday, 24 August 2000 17:43:19 UTC