- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 15:04:12 -0400
- To: "Gregor Karlinger" <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
- Cc: "XML" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 11:37 8/28/2000 +0200, Gregor Karlinger wrote: >1. Since the content model is mixed, also a SignatureProperty Element > with no subelements, but only textual content should be allowed. >Therefore > the minOccurs attribute should have a correct value of '0' Ok. Fixed. >> <!ELEMENT SignatureProperty %Object.ANY; > >> <!ATTLIST SignatureProperty >> Target CDATA #REQUIRED >> Id ID #IMPLIED > > > >> <!ENTITY % Object.ANY >'(#PCDATA|Signature|SignatureProperties|Manifest)*'> > >2. The content model for SignatureProperty according to the DTD definition >allows > also things like Signature and SignatureProperties, which are in the >namespace > of XML-Signature. This is in contradiction with the declartion of > namespace='##other' in the schema above. Right. This isn't really a mistake as much as a best effort since the DTD is limited (and I didn't want to create too many entities) and the schema permits specificity and I know it wouldn't make sense just to throw a naked signature in SignatureProperties... I could create a SignatureProperties.ANY that was #PCDATA only, I could make the schema definition ##any, or leave it as is. What's your preference? _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Monday, 28 August 2000 15:04:17 UTC