Re: CanonicalizationMethod

At 20:12 7/20/00 +1000, Thomas Maslen wrote:
 >In similar vein, CanonicalizationMethod is treated as optional in a few
 >other places:
 
Thanks! I've fixed it in my editors' copy and should be represented in the
next version.



_________________________________________________________
Joseph Reagle Jr.   
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/

Received on Friday, 21 July 2000 13:40:58 UTC