- From: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 23:02:33 -0400 (EDT)
- To: jboyer@PureEdge.com
- Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org, w3t-comm@w3.org
Here are just a few minor comments for your Last Call Canonical XML [1] "work in progress." Is "Canonical" a proper noun? It is lowercase in "canonical form" and uppercase in "Canonical XML." I would make it lowercase globally, except when referring to the title of this spec. "REQUIRED" and "MUST" seem to be used in the RFC 2119 sense. You might say so, and add http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt to References. Below, a clause and paragraph number are followed by a quote and then a suggestion. Comments are in brackets []. 2. par. 7 [Define QName here, rather than wait until the last par. of clause 4.] 2. par. 8 URI [You might add a [URI] link, and add http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt to References.] 2. par. 10, list item 4 XPath recommendation XPath Recommendation Clause 3, "Document Order for Canonical XML," needs to be numbered "3". 4. par. 4, list item 3 reference
 reference 
 5. last par. NOTE:XML NOTE: XML A.1. par. 1 rational rationale A.2. "...However, the statement in Namespaces in XML that "the prefix functions only as a placeholder for a namespace name" is incorrect." [Is it a known errata item? A negative comment inside a specification about another spec. seems somehow out of place without what you term "resolution." Sorry I didn't find it in a quick search of xml-names-editor, or in http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-names-19990114-errata. Maybe in place of "is incorrect" say "needs clarification" or "needs modification"?] A.2. Proof:Let [twice] Proof: Let Remark:The Remark: The Theorem 2:With Theorem 2: With Remark:Since Remark: Since conclusion to be draw conclusion to be drawn XML-related recommendations, working drafts XML-related Recommendations, Working Drafts A.3. nodes (they are bound...). [I would make that two, shorter sentences:] nodes. (They are bound....) [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xml-c14n-20000710 Best wishes for your project, -- Susan Lesch, W3C mailto:lesch@w3.org
Received on Friday, 14 July 2000 09:10:30 UTC