- From: Gregor Karlinger <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 17:04:42 +0200
- To: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>, "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
My vote is for #2. Since neither Canonical XML nor XML-Signature interpret namespace uri values in an other way as that they are strings, I don't see a reason to forbid the generation of a canonical version for XML docs using relative namespace uris. Regards, Gregor --------------------------------------------------------------- Gregor Karlinger mailto://gregor.karlinger@iaik.at http://www.iaik.at Phone +43 316 873 5541 Institute for Applied Information Processing and Communications Austria ---------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 20 September 2000 11:04:03 UTC