- From: Martin J. Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 15:17:14 +0900
- To: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>, "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
- Cc: "Donald Eastlake" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>, <lde008@dma.isg.mot.com>
At 00/09/22 16:28 -0400, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. wrote: >So the results of recent discussion on this topic were rather >muddled/mixed which is not surprising given the state of the issue ><smile>. Our own discussion was split [2] with some confusion regarding >the meaning of "unspecified". Additionally, the brief discussion at the >XML Plenary meeting didn't give us an inescapable argument either [1]. > >However, I think John's recently analysis [2,c] is delightfully unmuddled >(just two variables and their enumeration). Hello Joseph, I fully agree to go with your and John's conclusions. Regards, Martin.
Received on Monday, 25 September 2000 02:35:06 UTC