- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 12:51:56 -0400
- To: Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Cc: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 12:15 9/7/2000 -0400, Donald Eastlake 3rd wrote: ><code>DigestMethod</code> or <code>DigestValue</code> sub-element and >presence of the <code>URI</code> and <code>Type</code> attributes is >mandatory. We still have to deal with the mandatorines of that attribute. That means people HAVE to come up with a type. Is this intended? We only specify a subset of key types. Consequently people will come up with other types (that is fine) or throw dummy text in there which seems like a bad thing if they want to rely upon type information found elsewhere. _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2000 12:52:02 UTC