- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 15:16:52 -0400
- To: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org, Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com
Who/when is the action item on sending text to the list? At 02:22 9/5/2000 -0400, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd wrote: >RSA Signature Format: > URIs to identify wrapping of the Signature? > include OIDs? >Inclusion of the algorithm OIDs within the secured >potion of the signature is needed for security. No one saw >any reason to include plain text OIDs outside that area. >The current specification that such an OID prefix is included >should be dropped. > >Raw X.509 Cert Type: > The consensus on the call was that adding a RetrievalMethod >Type for a binary X.509 certificate was a good idea. It was >also clarified that the Type should specify the type of the >data AFTER application of the transforms. So, for example, one >could retrieve a plain Base 64 encoded certificate and use it >with this type by providing a Base 64 decode transform. _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Tuesday, 5 September 2000 15:17:14 UTC