- From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 11:22:50 -0400
- To: Merlin Hughes <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- cc: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Great, thanks. I assume you don't mind if I post the binary and an exploded version on xmldsig.pothole.com. I don't see any problem with a binary this small (<15K) being posted to the mailing list but for big binaries, it would be best to make them available via ftp or the web and post a notice... Thanks, Donald From: Merlin Hughes <merlin@baltimore.ie> Message-Id: <200007261420.PAA28308@bobcat.baltimore.ie> To: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 15:20:29 +0100 >Hi, > >I have (hopefully) attached a gzipped tarchive containing >a sample signature based on WD-xmldsig-core-20000711. A >Readme.txt contains forty words of detail. > >The document is a single enveloped signature which itself >is enveloping a manifest and signature properties. It >employs base 64, XPath, XSL and C14N transforms. It uses >DSA, and includes just the DSA public key value. > >Included are all required resources along with the >intermediate output of all phases of C14N and XSL >processing. > >The XSL transform is encoded as an xsl:stylesheet element >embedded directly within the Transform element. For >compatibility, I have also included a separate version >using a stringified XSLT element. > >Validation of some references requires an XML parser which >can resolve IDs. > >I apologize for attaching a binary, if that is against >etiquette, but the associated resources are sufficient >that attaching all as text would be disturbing. > >Any comments are welcome. > >merlin
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2000 11:20:37 UTC