- From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 13:56:47 -0400
- To: "Steve Wang" <steve.wang@chromatix.com>
- cc: <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
I'll check into this. It's actually from Charlie Kaufman of Iris who should be credited... Donald From: "Steve Wang" <steve.wang@chromatix.com> Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 10:52:51 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Message-Id: <200009211452.KAA09077@www19.w3.org> Message-ID: <001b01c023db$d6755e80$65030a0a@chromatix.com> To: <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org> References: <200007171914.PAA20986@torque.pothole.com> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 10:54:25 -0400 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0018_01C023BA.4ED11B70" >Hi, all, > >In the section 6.4.2 of the current XML DSIG documentation, it says that >the prefix is hex 30 21 30 1F 06 05 2B 0E 03 02 1A 05 00 04 14 > >I just wonder if it should be hex 30 21 30 09 06 05 2B 0E 03 02 1A 05 00 = >04 14, i.e., >the byte 1F should be 09. > >Thank you in advance! > >Steve
Received on Thursday, 21 September 2000 13:53:50 UTC