[Barb/Brian: I'm deferring GK13-16,20 to you.] > [GK13]Why key(s) and not key? How can more than >exacly one key be used? I believe that might be because more than one key might be required for trust, but not for Signature validation, so I'd agree with you. Barbara? [Barb] Multiple declarations refer to the same key - which we state. "Keys" should be changed to "key." > [GK14]How can more than exacly one key be used? Barbara? [Barb] This is an error. It should be a single key. > [GK15]Here the value for exactly one key can be >determined! Yes, the schema and prose are in conflict. [Barb] agree. > [GK16]Right: minOccurs='0' [Barb] agree > [GK20]Only a single certificate possible here? [Barb] Yes. One per clause.
Received on Thursday, 27 July 2000 03:26:26 UTC