- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 17:23:10 -0400
- To: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
- Cc: "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@icl.com>, James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>, "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>, "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
I'd like people to send their feedback on Wednesday September 20 (not 30, typo on the digit). So again, let us know how you feel on this issue by _this_ Wednesday. Thanks. Forwarded Text ---- >Before we request Candidate Rec status for Canonical XML there's one issue >that I've been trying to understand and come to closure on, and that's the >implications of the recent XML Plenary decision on Canonical XML: "to >deprecate the use of relative URI references in namespace declarations." >[1] What does that mean for the Canonical Form? We've had some discussion >on this over this week in this WG [2], some discussion in the XML >Coordination Group, and I also briefly discussed this with TimBL. I think >the two options we now face are below. Please post your preference -- and >optionally reason/rationale -- by end of day Wednesday September 30th. __ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Monday, 18 September 2000 17:24:59 UTC