- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 11:45:31 -0400
- To: Ed Simon <ed.simon@entrust.com>
- Cc: "'w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org'" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, "'ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk'" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
At 13:54 7/26/2000 -0400, Ed Simon wrote: >I think we need input from someone like Henry T. who deeply >understands schemas. While we await an answer from Henry, I came up with the following prose (if schema doesn't do the complete trick) since I'm looking at that section anyway. We could probably get rid of the XSLT element type in the dsig namespace as its just a hint in the schema that style sheets can go there ... http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xmldsig-core-20000711/#sec-XSLT 6.6.5 XSLT Transform Identifier: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xslt-19991116 The Transform element contains a single <XSLT> element /+ that MUST contain a single <stylesheet> element (and its children/content) as defined by the XSL Transforms [XSLT] language and its namespace.+/ The processing rules for the XSLT transform are stated in the XSLT specification [XSLT]. _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Wednesday, 2 August 2000 11:45:53 UTC