comment on update
Syntax of MINUS
[ACTION-207] draft response ED-1
- [ACTION-218] wrong header, should have been ACTION-218 instead (was: [ACTION-207] draft response ED-1)
- [ACTION-207] draft response NA-1
today's TC minutes ... http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-03-30
Examples of MINUS and NOT EXISTS
SPARQL TC 2010-03-30 Agenda
thanks!
SPARQL Federation Extensions draft
Aggregate extensibility
slight time change on the agenda tomorrow... in cases someone wants to dial in
ISSUE-56: Does HTTP PATCH affect either the SPARQL Protocol or the SPARQL Uniform etc. HTTP etc. Protocol?
more on RIF entailment regime
Entailment regimes doc comments (typo, D-Entailment, RIF Core Entailment)
SPARQL update and datasets
DAWG test suite & process overview
[testcases] some PropertyPaths test cases...
[test cases] ACTION-191 starting with some test cases for aggregates...
- Re: [test cases] ACTION-191 starting with some test cases for aggregates...
- Fw: [test cases] ACTION-191 starting with some test cases for aggregates...
example in Section 9 in query 1.1
Fwd: Re: sparql 1.1 work in progress grammar
Fwd: SPARQL update (draft) question on LOAD uris
the HTTP PATCH spec
HTTP PATCH?
F2F3
last actions before F2F @all
SPARQL WG minutes 23 Mar 2010
Regrets
F2F3 Agenda Annotated
SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 23, 2010
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 23, 2010
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 23, 2010
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 23, 2010
F2F location
Comment Response to Rob Vesse (RV-2)
[TF-ENT] Updated doc with D-Entailment, revised Direct Semantics and proofs
Semantics of multi-expression aggregators
Combined grammar (work in progress)
SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 16, 2010
- Property Paths Update
- Property Path Update (doc issues)
- Property Paths Update (negated property classes)
Nested CONSTRUCTs and Blank node minting
Updated F2F3 Agenda
Do we need DELETE and CLEAR?
Where operation delimiters matter
apologies
Agenda for today in 2 hours
At risk for telecon
Not yet an agenda for tomorrow
Regrets for tomorrow's teleconference
[TF-ENT] Agenda for this week's ent. regimes teleconf
Fwd: Daylight Saving Time start for 2010
Fwd: Daylight Saving Time start for 2010
Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet
[TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Some Embedding necessary for RIF-Simple - Was Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: Some Embedding necessary for RIF-Simple - Was Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: Some Embedding necessary for RIF-Simple - Was Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: Some Embedding necessary for RIF-Simple - Was Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: Some Embedding necessary for RIF-Simple - Was Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: Some Embedding necessary for RIF-Simple - Was Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: Some Embedding necessary for RIF-Simple - Was Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: Some Embedding necessary for RIF-Simple - Was Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
- Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section
F2F3 agenda and time slots
ISSUE-55: Can/how can a separator string be supplied to the GROUP_CONCAT aggregate?
Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT()
- Re: Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT()
- Re: Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT()
- Re: Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT()
[TF-PP] Duplicates and simple property path expressions.
[TF-PP] cycles - simple or a walk
Entailment Regimes meeting notes
DELETE and blank nodes
- Re: DELETE and blank nodes
- Re: DELETE and blank nodes
- Re: DELETE and blank nodes
- Re: DELETE and blank nodes
- Re: DELETE and blank nodes
- Re: DELETE and blank nodes
Errors from entailment regimes
SPARQL WG Minutes - March 2, 2010
SPARQL WG Agenda - March 2, 2010
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - March 2, 2010
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - March 2, 2010
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - March 2, 2010
draft response to Nicholas J Humfrey
SPARQL 1.1 Protocol formats
[TF-ENT] 24th Feb teleconf summary
[TF-Ent] next teleconf 3rd March
[TF-ENT] Condition C2 modifications
- Re: [TF-ENT] Condition C2 modifications
- Re: [TF-ENT] Condition C2 modifications
- Re: [TF-ENT] Condition C2 modifications
Minutes from 2010-02-23
SPARQL Protocol open issues summary
Regrets
[TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins
- Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins
- Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins
- Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins
Re: Test framework for Update
[TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf
- Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf
- Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf
- Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf
- Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf
- Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf
- finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. (was: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf)
- Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. (was: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf)
- Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset.
- Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset.
- Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset.
- Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset.
- Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset.
- Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset.
- Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset.
- Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset.
- Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset.
- Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset.
- Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset.
- Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset.
- Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. (was: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf)
- Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf
- Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset.
SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Feb. 23
Leaving the working group.
[TF ENT] RIF teleconf
Fwd: 2010 Semantic Technology Conference: Speaker Confirmations
[TF-ENT] RIF teleconf
[TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update
- Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update
Today's minutes available at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-02-16
ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us?
- Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us?
- Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us?
- Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us?
- Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us?
- Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us?
- Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us?
- Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us?
- Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us?
- Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us?
- Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us?
- Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us?
Pending issues for update
on the alternative aggregate proposal (ED-1)...
SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues. Feb. 16
At risk for 16th Feb
Apologies
side remarks on the shortcut discussion for INSERT/DELETE...
- Re: side remarks on the shortcut discussion for INSERT/DELETE...
Draft Response to ED-1
Draft response for comment N3-1
SPARQL TC minutes from 2010-02-09 available...
SPARQL TC minutes from 2010-01-26 nicely formatted...
Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits)
- Re: Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits)
Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-02-09
[TF-LIB] IN operator
Entailment regimes open issues
- Re: Entailment regimes open issues
- Re: Entailment regimes open issues
Base URI in updates?
Finalizing syntax
SPARQL TC today cancelled.
- Re: SPARQL TC today cancelled.
Regrets
Apologies
Fwd: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Property Paths
Outstanding response to Leigh Dodds
Drafts published...
Call for Exclusions: SPARQL 1.1 Property Paths
Discussion of property paths, SPARQL and N3
Fwd: SPARQL WG publication of 1 FPWD and 6 new versions of WDs
Link checker on property-paths
Response to comments of Enrico
Wiki - testing pages
Query 1.1 Working Draft : 2010 Jan publication : link fixing.
Fixed some broken fragments in Protocol 1.1 Overview.xml
broken links/fragments in the entailment doc
Alexandre Bertails: Re: SPARQL WG publication of 1 FPWD and 6 new versions of WDs
- Re: Alexandre Bertails: Re: SPARQL WG publication of 1 FPWD and 6 new versions of WDs
- Re: Alexandre Bertails: Re: SPARQL WG publication of 1 FPWD and 6 new versions of WDs
Regrets for today's TC
SPARQL TC 2010-01-29 Agenda
Checking documents for publication
Call for Exclusions (Update): SPARQL 1.1 (Various)
SPARQL WG Minutes 2010-01-19
Update
Apologies
Update concern
SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. January 19, 2010
Regrets for telecon 19/Jan
Update changes
Service Description Vocabulary
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update
minutes from today http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-01-12
Service description namespace documents in place
Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"
Review of SPARQL 1.1 Protocol
Property Path Profiles
my comments on the "Property Paths" document
Agenda SPARQL TC 12/01/2010
Summary of recent issues on current query spec (to be discussed in detail after current WD round)
- Re: Summary of recent issues on current query spec (to be discussed in detail after current WD round)
- Re: Summary of recent issues on current query spec (to be discussed in detail after current WD round)
Fwd: SPARQL 1.1 Update
off-topic question on cursors
brief review on protocol
Security considerations in SPARQL Update
FILTER in abbreviated delete
Re: ISSUE-20: SPARQL Update: Empty vs non-existent graphs
- Re: ISSUE-20: SPARQL Update: Empty vs non-existent graphs
- Re: ISSUE-20: SPARQL Update: Empty vs non-existent graphs
Re: Update on Update
Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update"
- Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update"
[TF-ENT] Informative section added regarding updates
Minutes of 5th January meeting
Applogies
SemTech attendees?
property paths review
HTTP RDF Update review
service description call tomorrow
Sparql Protocol 1.1 Review
open comments
Re: [TF-ENT] Review of the Entailment regime document, 2009-12
WSDL Conformance and Optional Operations
Service Description 1.1 Review
[public-rdf-dawg] <none>
entailment review - part 1
- Re: entailment review - part 1
URI-s for OWL 2 profiles and Entailment regimes published
Apologies
SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments
- Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments
- Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments
- Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments
- Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments