Re: Combined grammar (work in progress) from Andy Seaborne on 2010-03-16 (public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from January to March 2010)

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:48:14 +0000
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4B9F7E0E.3040809@talis.com>

Observation:

   The quad templates in SPARQL 1.1 Update use GRAPH.

   SPARQL triple templates and BGP are like Turtle with variables.

   Should we allow the style of TriG+variables?

(grammar wise, it's no big deal because of the "no repeating bnode 
labels" rule).

   What about N-Quads?

N-Quads is not a subset of TrIG unlike N-triples and Turtle - worse, 
N-Quads puts the graph node at the end (for good reasons) while TriG 
puts the graph name before the triples.

 Andy

Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2010 12:48:46 UTC