Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us?

On 16 Feb 2010, at 17:23, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:

> On 2/16/2010 11:52 AM, Paul Gearon wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:24 AM, SPARQL Working Group Issue Tracker
>> <>  wrote:
>>> ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD?  
>>> Is this in scope for us?
>> I believe that we want this.
>> The scope of what property functions are capable of is essentially
>> unrestricted, so I don't think it's possible to really describe what
>> these functions do. However, it should be possible to obtain a list  
>> of
>> properties that fall into this category. As a user I would find that
>> useful in two ways:
>> 1. I'd know that using this property in a query, or getting it back  
>> in
>> a result involves entailed data, and not just extensional data.
>> 2. If I happen to recognize a property from the list, I will know  
>> that
>> a particular feature will be available to me.
> I'd be surprised if anyone disagrees that this is useful.
> However, I have no idea how we would specify it in the service  
> description document. How would we define a property/class that  
> describes something that is not itself defined anywhere? The only  
> way I see to do it is to define what a property function is, and  
> that's beyond our scope.

Right, this is my feeling too.

- Steve

Steve Harris, Garlik Limited
2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK
+44 20 8973 2465
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10  

Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2010 17:28:48 UTC