- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:21:47 -0400
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 3/16/2010 8:48 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > Observation: > > The quad templates in SPARQL 1.1 Update use GRAPH. > > SPARQL triple templates and BGP are like Turtle with variables. > > Should we allow the style of TriG+variables? > > (grammar wise, it's no big deal because of the "no repeating bnode > labels" rule). > > What about N-Quads? > > N-Quads is not a subset of TrIG unlike N-triples and Turtle - worse, > N-Quads puts the graph node at the end (for good reasons) while TriG > puts the graph name before the triples. Broadly speaking, I think this is a neat idea, but in practice I think it makes sense to adopt the SPARQL 1.0 Query mechanism for talking about quads (GRAPH). Lee > > Andy > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2010 13:22:24 UTC