Re: Response to comments of Enrico

Looks good to me! Thanks

Ivan

On 2010-1-27 16:42 , Birte Glimm wrote:
> On 27 January 2010 10:10, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>> Hey Birte,
>>
>> I propose to simply send the short paragraph you quoted below:
>>
>>>
>>> For the OWL entailment regimes we do not envisage an encoding into
>>> SPARQL queries that are then evaluated under simple entailment
>>> semantics. The current working draft includes an OWL Direct Semantics
>>> entailment regime that hopefully clarifies this. The working draft
>>> does not yet define an entailment regime for OWL RDF-Based Semantics
>>> (which is used for the OWL 2 RL profile), but that is envisaged for a
>>> future working draft.
>>>
>>
>> Maybe you can also say (it is true, isn't it?) that the RDF-Based
>> Semantics entailment is planned to follow the same approach, ie, no
>> encoding into SPARQL queries... But you can safely ignore this, too.
> 
> Since I say "For the OWL entailment regimes ", I think that is ok.
> In general, we do not really care how precisely an implementor
> implements the spec (as long as the spec is implementable). Query
> rewriting or materialisation of inferences upfront are both workable
> although of course incomplete for OWL Full and not really working on
> OWL DL input either.
> 
> Here's my revised response draft:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:EF
> 
> Birte
> 
> 
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Ivan
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
>> FOAF   : http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>> vCard  : http://www.ivan-herman.net/HermanIvan.vcf
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF   : http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
vCard  : http://www.ivan-herman.net/HermanIvan.vcf