- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:36:41 +0000
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Forwarded with permission Andy -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: sparql 1.1 work in progress grammar Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:42:41 +0000 From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@gmail.com> To: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org> CC: Andy Seaborne <andy@seaborne.org> On 24/03/2010 2:14 PM, Dave Beckett wrote: > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/sparql-grammar-11.html#rGraphRef > > [38] > DFT should be 'DEFAULT' I assume based on some of the posted examples. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0569.html Failure by the scripts to expand the token for HTML presentation - Thanks for pointing it out - fixed in the HTML generation process. > On list you asked about tests. I've been grabbing and adding them to > rasqal GIT although since the syntax is in flux, some won't represent > the latest draft draft... > > http://git.librdf.org/view?p=rasqal.git;a=tree;f=tests/sparql/update;h=4c278976147d8a0e4119afec2cbd0e4f78745c83;hb=HEAD > > I also had a hard time figuring out what BNODE() is going to do. Could > the next WD at least have 1 sentence per new token (STRDT etc.) even if > there is no time for a formal definition? It should - who should generate the content is unclear as it's under the "library" work. I added it to the grammar so at least the grammar mentioned it. generate a BNODE(), new one each time (like [] in a CONSTRUCT template) generates a BNODE("label"), same one each time for that solution (c.f. CONSTRUCT _:a) > > Dave May I forward your message? Andy
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 15:37:13 UTC