Fwd: Re: sparql 1.1 work in progress grammar

Forwarded with permission

	Andy
	
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: sparql 1.1 work in progress grammar
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:42:41 +0000
From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@gmail.com>
To: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
CC: Andy Seaborne <andy@seaborne.org>



On 24/03/2010 2:14 PM, Dave Beckett wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/sparql-grammar-11.html#rGraphRef
>
> [38]
> DFT should be 'DEFAULT' I assume based on some of the posted examples.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0569.html

Failure by the scripts to expand the token for HTML presentation -
Thanks for pointing it out - fixed in the HTML generation process.

> On list you asked about tests.  I've been grabbing and adding them to
> rasqal GIT although since the syntax is in flux, some won't represent
> the latest draft draft...
>
> http://git.librdf.org/view?p=rasqal.git;a=tree;f=tests/sparql/update;h=4c278976147d8a0e4119afec2cbd0e4f78745c83;hb=HEAD
>
> I also had a hard time figuring out what BNODE() is going to do.  Could
> the next WD at least have 1 sentence per new token (STRDT etc.) even if
> there is no time for a formal definition?

It should - who should generate the content is unclear as it's under the
"library" work.  I added it to the grammar so at least the grammar
mentioned it.

generate a BNODE(), new one each time (like [] in a CONSTRUCT template)

generates a BNODE("label"), same one each time for that solution
(c.f. CONSTRUCT _:a)

>
> Dave

May I forward your message?

	Andy

Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 15:37:13 UTC