On 2010-3-5 24:36 , Axel Polleres wrote: > > No objections, but one additional side question: > > Do we have an issue with systems that use canonical forms of datatype literals internally? > > Say you have: > > :s :p "1.000"^^xsd:decimal > > is a Datatype-aware system really supposed to return > > "1.000"^^xsd:decimal > > on { :s :p ?O} > > but not it's internal representation? > > This is a good question, I do not know the answer:-(, but is this an entailment specific question? I would expect that to be a question for SPARQL as a whole... Cheers Ivan -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF : http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf vCard : http://www.ivan-herman.net/HermanIvan.vcf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:02 UTC