On 2010-3-5 24:36 , Axel Polleres wrote:
>
> No objections, but one additional side question:
>
> Do we have an issue with systems that use canonical forms of datatype literals internally?
>
> Say you have:
>
> :s :p "1.000"^^xsd:decimal
>
> is a Datatype-aware system really supposed to return
>
> "1.000"^^xsd:decimal
>
> on { :s :p ?O}
>
> but not it's internal representation?
>
>
This is a good question, I do not know the answer:-(, but is this an
entailment specific question? I would expect that to be a question for
SPARQL as a whole...
Cheers
Ivan
--
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF : http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
vCard : http://www.ivan-herman.net/HermanIvan.vcf