- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:52:10 +0000
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Cc: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 16 Mar 2010, at 09:39, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 16/03/2010 4:50 AM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>> Chime and Andy, I'd like to focus on HTTP Update and Property Paths
>> today. I of course understand if the late notice makes it difficult
>> for
>> you to lead a discussion, but we'll do the best we can.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/property-paths/Overview.xml
>
> Technical issues outstanding:
>
>
>
> Summary of Proposals:
> Duplicates: allow them.
> Cycles: no duplicates of endpoints of operators
> whole path duplicates works out as composition of operators.
+1 to both of these proposals.
The commonality with { ?x foaf:knows ?z . ?z foaf:knows ?y } makes a
lot of sense to me.
- Steve
--
Steve Harris, Garlik Limited
2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK
+44 20 8973 2465 http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10
9AD
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2010 12:52:40 UTC