public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from January to March 2010 by author

Alexandre Passant

• Re: Syntax of MINUS (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: Syntax of MINUS (Wednesday, 31 March)
• F2F location (Monday, 22 March)
• Regrets (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Minutes of 5th January meeting (Thursday, 7 January)

Andy Seaborne

• Re: [ACTION-218] wrong header, should have been ACTION-218 instead (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [ACTION-207] draft response NA-1 (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: Syntax of MINUS (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: Examples of MINUS and NOT EXISTS (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Syntax of MINUS (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: Aggregate extensibility (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Aggregate extensibility (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: SPARQL Federation Extensions draft (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Examples of MINUS and NOT EXISTS (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: SPARQL Federation Extensions draft (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: SPARQL update (draft) question on LOAD uris (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: [testcases] some PropertyPaths test cases... (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [test cases] ACTION-191 starting with some test cases for aggregates... (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Fwd: Re: sparql 1.1 work in progress grammar (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Fwd: SPARQL update (draft) question on LOAD uris (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: HTTP PATCH? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: last actions before F2F @all (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Combined grammar (work in progress) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Combined grammar (work in progress) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Comment Response to Rob Vesse (RV-2) (Sunday, 21 March)
• Re: Semantics of multi-expression aggregators (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: Combined grammar (work in progress) (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: Combined grammar (work in progress) (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Combined grammar (work in progress) (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Property Paths Update (negated property classes) (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Property Path Update (doc issues) (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Property Paths Update (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: Nested CONSTRUCTs and Blank node minting (Sunday, 14 March)
• Re: [TF-LIB] BNode (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [TF-LIB] BNode (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [TF-LIB] BNode (Thursday, 11 March)
• Re: Base URI in updates? (Thursday, 11 March)
• Re: Do we need DELETE and CLEAR? (Thursday, 11 March)
• Re: Where operation delimiters matter (Thursday, 11 March)
• Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT() (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet (Sunday, 7 March)
• Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet (Sunday, 7 March)
• Re: Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT() (Sunday, 7 March)
• Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (Sunday, 7 March)
• Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (Sunday, 7 March)
• Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: D-enatilment and canonicalization (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT() (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: D-enatilment and canonicalization (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: D-enatilment and canonicalization (Friday, 5 March)
• D-enatilment and canonicalization (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: draft response to Nicholas J Humfrey (Thursday, 4 March)
• [TF-PP] Duplicates and simple property path expressions. (Thursday, 4 March)
• [TF-PP] cycles - simple or a walk (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: DELETE and blank nodes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: DELETE and blank nodes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: DELETE and blank nodes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: DELETE and blank nodes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: DELETE and blank nodes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: Errors from entailment regimes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Protocol formats (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: [TF-LIB] BNode (was: Finalizing built-ins) (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Draft response for comment N3-1 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Draft response for comment N3-1 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Draft response for comment N3-1 (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Test framework for Update (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Test framework for Update (Monday, 22 February)
• Returning datasets (was: Re: side remarks on the shortcut discussion for INSERT/DELETE...) (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Draft Response to ED-1 (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: side remarks on the shortcut discussion for INSERT/DELETE... (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: side remarks on the shortcut discussion for INSERT/DELETE... (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Draft Response to ED-1 (Thursday, 11 February)
• Draft response for comment N3-1 (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits) (Tuesday, 9 February)
• ISSUE-12 (HAVING vs FILTER) (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits) (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-02-09 (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits) (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: SPARQL TC today cancelled. (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: SPARQL TC today cancelled. (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: [TF-LIB] IN operator (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: Summary of recent issues on current query spec (to be discussed in detail after current WD round) (Monday, 8 February)
• [TF-LIB] IN operator (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: Base URI in updates? (Friday, 5 February)
• Base URI in updates? (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: ISSUE-29: MINUS / NOT EXISTS (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: ISSUE-35: DISTINCT/aggregates (Wednesday, 3 February)
• ISSUE-29: MINUS / NOT EXISTS (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [TF-PP] Property sets in paths (Wednesday, 3 February)
• ISSUE-35: DISTINCT/aggregates (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Finalizing syntax (Wednesday, 3 February)
• [TF-PP] Property sets in paths (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Finalizing syntax (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Prioritized issues / Query (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Summary of open issues on query. (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Property Paths (Monday, 1 February)
• Fwd: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Property Paths (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Discussion of property paths, SPARQL and N3 (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: Discussion of property paths, SPARQL and N3 (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: Discussion of property paths, SPARQL and N3 (Friday, 29 January)
• Discussion of property paths, SPARQL and N3 (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Link checker on property-paths (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Wiki - testing pages (Tuesday, 26 January)
• Query 1.1 Working Draft : 2010 Jan publication : link fixing. (Tuesday, 26 January)
• Re: datasets in update (Friday, 22 January)
• Re: Update changes (Tuesday, 19 January)
• Re: datasets in update (Tuesday, 19 January)
• Re: Update changes (Monday, 18 January)
• Regrets for telecon 19/Jan (Saturday, 16 January)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update (Thursday, 14 January)
• Re: Update ISSUEs summary of how far we got today (Thursday, 14 January)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: Property Path Profiles (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: off-topic question on cursors (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Property Path Profiles (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: my comments on the "Property Paths" document (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" (Saturday, 9 January)
• Re: Summary of recent issues on current query spec (to be discussed in detail after current WD round) (Saturday, 9 January)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Informative section added regarding updates (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: ISSUE-20: SPARQL Update: Empty vs non-existent graphs (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: Update on Update (Thursday, 7 January)
• Re: property paths review (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: entailment review - part 1 (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-01-05 (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-01-05 (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: Query 1.1 Review (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: ACTION-brief review of property paths (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: Query 1.1 Review (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-01-05 (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: [TF-PP] Property Path FPWD (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: Review of Query 1.1 (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: Review of Query 1.1 (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: [TF-PP] Property Path FPWD (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: [TF-PP] Property Path FPWD (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: [TF-PP] Property Path FPWD (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: [TF-PP] Document now in CVS (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: [TF-PP] Minor comments on the current document (Monday, 4 January)

Axel Polleres

• Re: [ACTION-207] draft response NA-1 (Wednesday, 31 March)
• comment on update (Wednesday, 31 March)
• [ACTION-207] draft response NA-1 (Tuesday, 30 March)
• [ACTION-218] wrong header, should have been ACTION-218 instead (was: [ACTION-207] draft response ED-1) (Tuesday, 30 March)
• [ACTION-207] draft response ED-1 (Tuesday, 30 March)
• today's TC minutes ... http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-03-30 (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Aggregate extensibility (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: Aggregate extensibility (Monday, 29 March)
• F2F minutes (was: SPARQL TC 2010-03-30 Agenda) (Monday, 29 March)
• SPARQL TC 2010-03-30 Agenda (Monday, 29 March)
• Aggregate extensibility (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: more on RIF entailment regime (Thursday, 25 March)
• slight time change on the agenda tomorrow... in cases someone wants to dial in (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: SPARQL update and datasets (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: Do we need DELETE and CLEAR? (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: SPARQL update and datasets (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: DAWG test suite & process overview (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: more on RIF entailment regime (Thursday, 25 March)
• more on RIF entailment regime (Thursday, 25 March)
• Entailment regimes doc comments (typo, D-Entailment, RIF Core Entailment) (Thursday, 25 March)
• [testcases] some PropertyPaths test cases... (Wednesday, 24 March)
• [test cases] ACTION-191 starting with some test cases for aggregates... (Wednesday, 24 March)
• example in Section 9 in query 1.1 (Wednesday, 24 March)
• last actions before F2F @all (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Nested CONSTRUCTs and Blank node minting (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [TF-LIB] BNode (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [TF-LIB] BNode (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: [TF-LIB] BNode (was: Finalizing built-ins) (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Fwd: Daylight Saving Time start for 2010 (Monday, 8 March)
• F2F3 agenda and time slots (Saturday, 6 March)
• Re: D-enatilment and canonicalization (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: 2010 Semantic Technology Conference: Speaker Confirmations (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Condition C2 modifications (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. (was: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. (was: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] RIF teleconf (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Today's minutes available at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-02-16 (Tuesday, 16 February)
• on the alternative aggregate proposal (ED-1)... (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: Entailment regimes open issues (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: side remarks on the shortcut discussion for INSERT/DELETE... (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: side remarks on the shortcut discussion for INSERT/DELETE... (Friday, 12 February)
• side remarks on the shortcut discussion for INSERT/DELETE... (Friday, 12 February)
• SPARQL TC minutes from 2010-02-09 available... (Tuesday, 9 February)
• SPARQL TC minutes from 2010-01-26 nicely formatted... (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: ISSUE-12 (HAVING vs FILTER) (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-02-09 (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-02-09 (Monday, 8 February)
• SPARQL TC today cancelled. (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Fwd: SPARQL WG publication of 1 FPWD and 6 new versions of WDs (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: Alexandre Bertails: Re: SPARQL WG publication of 1 FPWD and 6 new versions of WDs (Tuesday, 26 January)
• SPARQL TC 2010-01-29 Agenda (Monday, 25 January)
• Re: Checking documents for publication (Friday, 22 January)
• Re: Update ISSUEs summary of how far we got today (Monday, 18 January)
• Re: entailment review - part 2 (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: entailment review - part 2 (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Update ISSUEs summary of how far we got today (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: entailment review - part 2 (Tuesday, 12 January)
• minutes from today http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-01-12 (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: entailment review - part 2 (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: Update on Update (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: entailment review - part 2 (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: entailment review - part 2 (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" (Monday, 11 January)
• Agenda SPARQL TC 12/01/2010 (Sunday, 10 January)
• Summary of recent issues on current query spec (to be discussed in detail after current WD round) (Saturday, 9 January)
• Fwd: SPARQL 1.1 Update (Saturday, 9 January)
• off-topic question on cursors (Saturday, 9 January)
• brief review on protocol (Saturday, 9 January)
• entailment review - part 2 (Saturday, 9 January)
• Re: entailment review - part 1 (Wednesday, 6 January)
• open comments (Tuesday, 5 January)
• entailment review - part 1 (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-01-05 (Tuesday, 5 January)
• brief review for service description document (Tuesday, 5 January)
• ACTION-brief review of property paths (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-01-05 (Monday, 4 January)
• Review of Update 1.1 (Monday, 4 January)
• Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-01-05 (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: Review of Query 1.1 (Sunday, 3 January)

Birte Glimm

• F2F3 (Tuesday, 23 March)
• SPARQL WG minutes 23 Mar 2010 (Tuesday, 23 March)
• [TF-ENT] Updated doc with D-Entailment, revised Direct Semantics and proofs (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: Some Embedding necessary for RIF-Simple - Was Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Monday, 15 March)
• Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda for this week's ent. regimes teleconf (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Monday, 8 March)
• [TF-ENT] Agenda for this week's ent. regimes teleconf (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: F2F3 agenda and time slots (Sunday, 7 March)
• Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Sunday, 7 March)
• Re: D-enatilment and canonicalization (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: D-enatilment and canonicalization (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: DELETE and blank nodes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: [TF-Ent] next teleconf 3rd March (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: DELETE and blank nodes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: DELETE and blank nodes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: DELETE and blank nodes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: Errors from entailment regimes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Errors from entailment regimes (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: [TF-Ent] next teleconf 3rd March (Sunday, 28 February)
• [TF-ENT] 24th Feb teleconf summary (Wednesday, 24 February)
• [TF-Ent] next teleconf 3rd March (Wednesday, 24 February)
• [TF-ENT] Condition C2 modifications (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. (Wednesday, 24 February)
• [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update (Friday, 19 February)
• [TF ENT] RIF teleconf (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update (Wednesday, 17 February)
• [TF-ENT] RIF teleconf (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: RIF+SPARQL (was Re: Entailment regimes open issues) (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: Entailment regimes open issues (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: Entailment regimes open issues (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: Summary of recent issues on current query spec (to be discussed in detail after current WD round) (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Entailment regimes open issues (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: RIF+SPARQL (was Re: Entailment regimes open issues) (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: RIF+SPARQL (was Re: Entailment regimes open issues) (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: Summary of recent issues on current query spec (to be discussed in detail after current WD round) (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: Entailment regimes open issues (Monday, 8 February)
• Entailment regimes open issues (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: Response to comments of Enrico (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: Response to comments of Enrico (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: Response to comments of Enrico (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Response to comments of Enrico (Tuesday, 26 January)
• broken links/fragments in the entailment doc (Tuesday, 26 January)
• Re: Checking documents for publication (Saturday, 23 January)
• Checking documents for publication (Friday, 22 January)
• Re: entailment review - part 2 (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: entailment review - part 2 (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: entailment review - part 2 (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: entailment review - part 2 (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: entailment review - part 2 (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: entailment review - part 2 (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: entailment review - part 2 (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Informative section added regarding updates (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Review of the Entailment regime document, 2009-12 (Thursday, 7 January)
• [TF-ENT] Informative section added regarding updates (Thursday, 7 January)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Review of the Entailment regime document, 2009-12 (Thursday, 7 January)
• Re: entailment review - part 1 (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: entailment review - part 1 (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Review of the Entailment regime document, 2009-12 (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-01-05 (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-01-05 (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-01-05 (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: Review of Query 1.1 (Monday, 4 January)
• Review of Query 1.1 (Saturday, 2 January)

Chimezie Ogbuji

• Re: more on RIF entailment regime (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: more on RIF entailment regime (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: HTTP PATCH? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: HTTP PATCH? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 23, 2010 (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: Some Embedding necessary for RIF-Simple - Was Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Monday, 15 March)
• Re: Some Embedding necessary for RIF-Simple - Was Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Monday, 15 March)
• Some Embedding necessary for RIF-Simple - Was Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Thursday, 11 March)
• Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Thursday, 11 March)
• Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: Base URI in updates? (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Regrets for tomorrow's teleconference (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Monday, 8 March)
• [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Sunday, 7 March)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - March 2, 2010 (Monday, 1 March)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] RIF teleconf (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: RIF+SPARQL (was Re: Entailment regimes open issues) (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: RIF+SPARQL (was Re: Entailment regimes open issues) (Monday, 8 February)
• Outstanding response to Leigh Dodds (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-01-29 Agenda (Tuesday, 26 January)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: HTTP RDF Update review (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" (Tuesday, 12 January)

David Charboneau

• Regrets (Tuesday, 23 March)
• SPARQL Protocol open issues summary (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Fixed some broken fragments in Protocol 1.1 Overview.xml (Tuesday, 26 January)
• Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Protocol (Monday, 18 January)
• Sparql Protocol 1.1 Review (Wednesday, 6 January)
• WSDL Conformance and Optional Operations (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Service Description 1.1 Review (Tuesday, 5 January)
• [public-rdf-dawg] <none> (Tuesday, 5 January)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: SPARQL Federation Extensions draft (Monday, 29 March)
• SPARQL Federation Extensions draft (Saturday, 27 March)

Gregory Williams

• Re: draft response to Nicholas J Humfrey (Saturday, 20 March)
• Comment Response to Rob Vesse (RV-2) (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: draft response to Nicholas J Humfrey (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: draft response to Nicholas J Humfrey (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (Tuesday, 2 March)
• draft response to Nicholas J Humfrey (Sunday, 28 February)
• SPARQL 1.1 Protocol formats (Sunday, 28 February)
• Minutes from 2010-02-23 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Service description open questions (was: Re: SPARQL TC today cancelled.) (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: SPARQL TC today cancelled. (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: SPARQL TC today cancelled. (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Service Description Vocabulary (Friday, 15 January)
• Service Description Vocabulary (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: brief review for service description document (Wednesday, 6 January)
• service description call tomorrow (Wednesday, 6 January)

Ian Jacobs

• Call for Exclusions: SPARQL 1.1 Property Paths (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Call for Exclusions (Update): SPARQL 1.1 (Various) (Thursday, 21 January)

Ivan Herman

• Re: Examples of MINUS and NOT EXISTS (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: SPARQL Federation Extensions draft (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: more on RIF entailment regime (Friday, 26 March)
• the HTTP PATCH spec (Wednesday, 24 March)
• HTTP PATCH? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 23, 2010 (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Updated doc with D-Entailment, revised Direct Semantics and proofs (Sunday, 21 March)
• Re: Some Embedding necessary for RIF-Simple - Was Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Monday, 15 March)
• Re: Some Embedding necessary for RIF-Simple - Was Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Saturday, 13 March)
• Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Fwd: Daylight Saving Time start for 2010 (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: [TF-PP] Duplicates and simple property path expressions. (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: D-enatilment and canonicalization (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Condition C2 modifications (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [TF-PP] cycles - simple or a walk (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [TF-PP] Duplicates and simple property path expressions. (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: DELETE and blank nodes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: DELETE and blank nodes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: DELETE and blank nodes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: DELETE and blank nodes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: DELETE and blank nodes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: DELETE and blank nodes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: DELETE and blank nodes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: Errors from entailment regimes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Condition C2 modifications (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: [TF ENT] RIF teleconf (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: Leaving the working group. (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] RIF teleconf (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: RIF+SPARQL (was Re: Entailment regimes open issues) (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: Draft Response to ED-1 (Saturday, 13 February)
• Re: Draft Response to ED-1 (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: RIF+SPARQL (was Re: Entailment regimes open issues) (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: Entailment regimes open issues (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: [TF-PP] Property sets in paths (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Outstanding response to Leigh Dodds (Friday, 29 January)
• Drafts published... (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: Response to comments of Enrico (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: Response to comments of Enrico (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: Response to comments of Enrico (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: Service Description Vocabulary (Friday, 15 January)
• Service description namespace documents in place (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: Property Path Profiles (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: Property Path Profiles (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Summary of recent issues on current query spec (to be discussed in detail after current WD round) (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Review of the Entailment regime document, 2009-12 (Thursday, 7 January)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Review of the Entailment regime document, 2009-12 (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments (Tuesday, 5 January)
• URI-s for OWL 2 profiles and Entailment regimes published (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: [TF-PP] Property Path FPWD (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: [TF-PP] Property Path FPWD (Monday, 4 January)

Ivan Mikhailov

• Re: Aggregate extensibility (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: ISSUE-12 (HAVING vs FILTER) (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: [TF-LIB] IN operator (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: [TF-LIB] IN operator (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: [TF-LIB] IN operator (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: [TF-PP] Property sets in paths (Thursday, 4 February)

Jos de Bruijn

• Re: Some Embedding necessary for RIF-Simple - Was Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Monday, 15 March)
• Re: Some Embedding necessary for RIF-Simple - Was Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section (Monday, 15 March)
• Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. (Wednesday, 24 February)

Kendall Clark

• Re: off-topic question on cursors (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: SemTech attendees? (Wednesday, 6 January)

Lee Feigenbaum

• thanks! (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: SPARQL update and datasets (Thursday, 25 March)
• SPARQL update and datasets (Thursday, 25 March)
• DAWG test suite & process overview (Thursday, 25 March)
• F2F3 Agenda Annotated (Tuesday, 23 March)
• SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 23, 2010 (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: F2F location (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: F2F location (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: Comment Response to Rob Vesse (RV-2) (Sunday, 21 March)
• Re: Combined grammar (work in progress) (Tuesday, 16 March)
• SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 16, 2010 (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Updated F2F3 Agenda (Friday, 12 March)
• Agenda for today in 2 hours (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Not yet an agenda for tomorrow (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (Sunday, 7 March)
• Re: Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT() (Sunday, 7 March)
• Re: Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT() (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (Friday, 5 March)
• DELETE and blank nodes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: Errors from entailment regimes (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Protocol formats (Monday, 1 March)
• SPARQL WG Agenda - March 2, 2010 (Monday, 1 March)
• Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Feb. 23 (Monday, 22 February)
• SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Feb. 23 (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: Pending issues for update (Friday, 19 February)
• Fwd: 2010 Semantic Technology Conference: Speaker Confirmations (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: on the alternative aggregate proposal (ED-1)... (Tuesday, 16 February)
• SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues. Feb. 16 (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: Draft Response to ED-1 (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Draft response for comment N3-1 (Thursday, 11 February)
• Service description open questions (was: Re: SPARQL TC today cancelled.) (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Entailment regimes open issues (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits) (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Draft Response to ED-1 (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits) (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: ISSUE-29: MINUS / NOT EXISTS (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Summary of open issues on query. (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: SPARQL TC today cancelled. (Tuesday, 2 February)
• SPARQL WG Minutes 2010-01-19 (Tuesday, 19 January)
• Re: datasets in update (Tuesday, 19 January)
• datasets in update (was: Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Protocol) (Monday, 18 January)
• SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. January 19, 2010 (Monday, 18 January)
• Re: Update changes (Monday, 18 January)
• Re: Property Path Profiles (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: brief review on protocol (Sunday, 10 January)
• Re: FILTER in abbreviated delete (Friday, 8 January)
• SemTech attendees? (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments (Wednesday, 6 January)
• property paths review (Wednesday, 6 January)
• HTTP RDF Update review (Wednesday, 6 January)

Luke Wilson-Mawer

• Leaving the working group. (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Apologies (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Apologies (Tuesday, 19 January)
• Review of SPARQL 1.1 Protocol (Monday, 11 January)

Matt Perry

• Apologies (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: Property Path Profiles (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: Property Path Profiles (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Property Path Profiles (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Property Path Profiles (Monday, 11 January)
• Property Path Profiles (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Query 1.1 Review (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Query 1.1 Review (Monday, 4 January)

Olivier Corby

• Regrets (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Update (Tuesday, 19 January)

Orri Erling

• RE: Aggregate extensibility (Monday, 29 March)
• RE: off-topic question on cursors (Monday, 11 January)

Passant, Alexandre

• Regrets for today's TC (Tuesday, 26 January)

Paul Gearon

• Re: Syntax of MINUS (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: Syntax of MINUS (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: SPARQL update (draft) question on LOAD uris (Wednesday, 24 March)
• apologies (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Test framework for Update (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Pending issues for update (Tuesday, 16 February)
• At risk for 16th Feb (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: Alexandre Bertails: Re: SPARQL WG publication of 1 FPWD and 6 new versions of WDs (Tuesday, 26 January)
• Re: Update (Tuesday, 19 January)
• Re: Update changes (Monday, 18 January)
• Re: Update concern (Monday, 18 January)
• Update changes (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update (Thursday, 14 January)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update (Thursday, 14 January)
• Security considerations in SPARQL Update (Friday, 8 January)
• FILTER in abbreviated delete (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: ISSUE-20: SPARQL Update: Empty vs non-existent graphs (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: Review of Update 1.1 (Thursday, 7 January)
• Re: ISSUE-20: SPARQL Update: Empty vs non-existent graphs (Thursday, 7 January)
• Re: Update on Update (Thursday, 7 January)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" (Thursday, 7 January)
• Apologies (Tuesday, 5 January)

Polleres, Axel

• Fw: [test cases] ACTION-191 starting with some test cases for aggregates... (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: D-enatilment and canonicalization (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Condition C2 modifications (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: Entailment regimes open issues (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: Link checker on property-paths (Wednesday, 27 January)

Richard Newman

• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update (Thursday, 14 January)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update (Thursday, 14 January)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 23, 2010 (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: Agenda for today in 2 hours (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: D-enatilment and canonicalization (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: 2010 Semantic Technology Conference: Speaker Confirmations (Thursday, 4 March)
• Entailment Regimes meeting notes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• SPARQL WG Minutes - March 2, 2010 (Tuesday, 2 March)
• [TF-ENT] Notes from 24th Feb teleconf (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Draft response for comment N3-1 (Monday, 22 February)
• RIF+SPARQL (was Re: Entailment regimes open issues) (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: Discussion of property paths, SPARQL and N3 (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: Discussion of property paths, SPARQL and N3 (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: Query 1.1 Working Draft : 2010 Jan publication : link fixing. (Tuesday, 26 January)
• Alexandre Bertails: Re: SPARQL WG publication of 1 FPWD and 6 new versions of WDs (Tuesday, 26 January)

Souri Das

• Re: my comments on the "Property Paths" document (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments (Tuesday, 5 January)

Souripriya Das

• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - March 2, 2010 (Tuesday, 2 March)
• my comments on the "Property Paths" document (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments (Tuesday, 5 January)
• SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments (Tuesday, 5 January)

SPARQL Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-56: Does HTTP PATCH affect either the SPARQL Protocol or the SPARQL Uniform etc. HTTP etc. Protocol? (Thursday, 25 March)
• ISSUE-55: Can/how can a separator string be supplied to the GROUP_CONCAT aggregate? (Friday, 5 March)
• ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (Tuesday, 16 February)

Steve Harris

• Re: Examples of MINUS and NOT EXISTS (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: Syntax of MINUS (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: Examples of MINUS and NOT EXISTS (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [ACTION-207] draft response NA-1 (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Aggregate extensibility (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Aggregate extensibility (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: SPARQL Federation Extensions draft (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: HTTP PATCH? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: Combined grammar (work in progress) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Semantics of multi-expression aggregators (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: Property Paths Update (negated property classes) (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: Combined grammar (work in progress) (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: Property Paths Update (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: Nested CONSTRUCTs and Blank node minting (Saturday, 13 March)
• Re: Do we need DELETE and CLEAR? (Thursday, 11 March)
• Do we need DELETE and CLEAR? (Thursday, 11 March)
• Where operation delimiters matter (Thursday, 11 March)
• At risk for telecon (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT() (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet (Sunday, 7 March)
• Re: Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT() (Sunday, 7 March)
• Re: Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT() (Sunday, 7 March)
• Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (Sunday, 7 March)
• Re: [TF-PP] Duplicates and simple property path expressions. (Friday, 5 March)
• Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT() (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [TF-PP] Duplicates and simple property path expressions. (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: 2010 Semantic Technology Conference: Speaker Confirmations (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: draft response to Nicholas J Humfrey (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: DELETE and blank nodes (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: DELETE and blank nodes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: DELETE and blank nodes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: DELETE and blank nodes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - March 2, 2010 (Monday, 1 March)
• Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Draft response for comment N3-1 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Draft response for comment N3-1 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: Returning datasets (was: Re: side remarks on the shortcut discussion for INSERT/DELETE...) (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: Draft Response to ED-1 (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: Draft Response to ED-1 (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: side remarks on the shortcut discussion for INSERT/DELETE... (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Draft Response to ED-1 (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Draft Response to ED-1 (Friday, 12 February)
• Draft Response to ED-1 (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits) (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits) (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits) (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: [TF-LIB] IN operator (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: [TF-LIB] IN operator (Monday, 8 February)
• Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits) (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: [TF-LIB] IN operator (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: Base URI in updates? (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: Base URI in updates? (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: ISSUE-29: MINUS / NOT EXISTS (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: ISSUE-29: MINUS / NOT EXISTS (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: ISSUE-35: DISTINCT/aggregates (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: ISSUE-29: MINUS / NOT EXISTS (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: ISSUE-35: DISTINCT/aggregates (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [TF-PP] Property sets in paths (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Summary of open issues on query. (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [TF-PP] Property sets in paths (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Finalizing syntax (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Apologies (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Property Paths (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Discussion of property paths, SPARQL and N3 (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: Discussion of property paths, SPARQL and N3 (Friday, 29 January)
• Apologies (Tuesday, 19 January)
• Re: Update concern (Monday, 18 January)
• Update concern (Monday, 18 January)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: FILTER in abbreviated delete (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: ISSUE-20: SPARQL Update: Empty vs non-existent graphs (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" (Friday, 8 January)
• Applogies (Thursday, 7 January)
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Changes to Query 1.1 (Monday, 4 January)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 March 2010 21:06:12 UTC