W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: SPARQL Federation Extensions draft

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:54:18 +0100
Message-ID: <4BB0BF1A.4040309@talis.com>
To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
CC: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org

This is great - I think we ought to include something in SPARQL 1.1 even 
if it's just the most basic SERVICE form because of time.  It it the 
semantic *web* ....


On 27/03/2010 3:36 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/fed/service
> take a look, help out, ...
> --
> -ericP

Specific comments:

"4.1 Definition of SERVICE"

The evaluation of service uses the SPARQL algebra union operator.

Elements of a group are usually join'ed together, not union'ed.

Algebra example:

  Service(?s :p2 ?v2)
  Service(<srvc> BGP(?s :p2 ?v2))

"with a query Q and no default or named graphs."

I think that means no FROM or FROM NAMED - correct?


This area is less clear to me - it's very useful to have something here 
but I'm not quite sure this is the right mechanism.

It's another form of assignment.

Is it the same as (the excessively verbose):

SELECT ("Alice" AS ?given)
        ("Anderson" AS ?family)
        (?mbox AS <mailto:alice@example.com>)
SELECT ("Bob" AS ?given)
        ("Robertson" AS ?family)
        (?mbox AS <mailto:eve@example.com>)
} UION { ... }

Probably better not to allow bNodes to be passed over the network.

Suggest s/UNBOUND/_/ or something a liitle less heavy. "-"
The definition of BINDING has UNDEF

* BINDING and Update:
This seems to overlap with INSERT DATA etc
It is unrelated to federated query.

The substutute operator might help in the definition:

Result are then a union of substitute for each binding row.  This is 
similar to the bind-join proposed by the IBM Garlic project.  It allows 
for the bINDINGs to be streamed in parallel with results coming back.

(this way the results of sending one BINDING at a time and sending all 
BINDINGS at once are the same).

** MIME Type

Doesn't the query often go in ?query= which isn't MIME typed.

Received on Monday, 29 March 2010 14:54:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:02 UTC